Inflectra Rapise vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

Inflectra and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #23 with an average rating of 4.0, while OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8. Inflectra holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

163 Views
79 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 38 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

1,860 Views
1,266 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

OpenText UFT Developer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Inflectra Rapise and OpenText UFT Developer are popular tools in the software testing market. OpenText UFT Developer has an upper hand due to its robust feature set, which outweighs the higher costs compared to Inflectra Rapise's pricing and support advantages.

Features: Inflectra Rapise offers flexibility in handling web, desktop, and mobile applications, supports custom frameworks, and includes record and playback functionality. It also provides cross-browser compatibility. OpenText UFT Developer integrates well with major CI/CD tools, supports various protocols like HTTP, SAP, and Oracle Forms, and offers advanced GUI and API testing capabilities. It simplifies developer involvement by allowing the use of familiar programming languages like C# and Java.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance its automation capabilities and integration with third-party applications, improve its interface to better handle complex test scenarios, and expand its reporting features. OpenText UFT Developer could work on simplifying its deployment process, enriching its documentation and resources for beginners, and reducing its resource consumption to improve efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise provides a straightforward deployment process with commendable customer service, making it easier for teams to adopt. OpenText UFT Developer involves a more complex deployment but compensates with comprehensive support options and a wide array of resources to facilitate implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is noted for its cost-effectiveness, offering a lower setup cost that leads to a quicker ROI. OpenText UFT Developer, though more expensive, delivers significant value with its extensive feature set, justifying the higher initial investment over time and aligning with businesses needing those advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities

OpenText UFT Developer ( /products/opentext-uft-developer-reviews ) is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework ( /products/framework-reviews ), and they work well together.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"OpenText UFT Developer works well with record technology, making it valuable for recording."

"The solution is very scalable."

"In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints."

"The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"Integrates well with other products."

More OpenText UFT Developer pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding."

"The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment."

"With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute."

"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise."

"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

"The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years."

More OpenText UFT Developer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

30%

Government

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 59% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 20% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

April 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

April 2025

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

OpenText

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer

April 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText UFT Developer report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.