No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Impartner PRM vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Impartner PRM
Ranking in AI Software Development
218th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Channel Marketing Automation Software (2nd), Partner Relationship Management (PRM) (1st), AI Customer Support (88th), AI Sales & Marketing (41st)
Make
Ranking in AI Software Development
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Impartner PRM is 0.1%. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make0.5%
Impartner PRM0.1%
Other99.4%
AI Software Development
 

Featured Reviews

JennieFinlayson - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Partner programs at OXBOTICA LIMITED
End-to-end partner management, quick partner onboarding and deep understanding of partner relationships
I like Impartner PRM's deep understanding of partnering; the tool understands and the tool enables you to sign up partners very quickly and give them the tools and the access they require to do what they need to do. So it can take a partner all the way from forming an interest with an organization all the way through to selling, then reselling, and then managing their partners. It's very easy for you to introduce new products. It's a complete solution - it manages and gives access to the partners so that they can see and work with the internal sales teams for the organizations as well as the customers. So, as you're moving it through the pipeline, both the salesperson from the company and also the partner can see where it is in the pipeline, when it's likely to close, and any issues or problems. So, it enables the partnering organization and the technology company to work together very well. It's a very good communication tool. So, it's through the Impartner portal of this tool. I have seen some improvements in communication with the partners. But it is heavily dependent on how it's set up, but it's very easy and quick to set up. However, it's very much dependent on the person setting it up knowing what they're doing. It certainly has analytics. It can analyze training, for instance, whether or not the training is successful. Often, working with a CRM tool like Salesforce will analyze how long it takes partners to start to become successful and how long it takes to sign them up. Then, it can start looking at which products are being sold and where there are issues with products. So, the reporting part is very straightforward. But, the reporting is only as good as the system's setup and the discipline of partners who input data into it.
Dinesh Lavu - PeerSpot reviewer
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects
Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like Impartner PRM's deep understanding of partnering; the tool understands and the tool enables you to sign up partners very quickly and give them the tools and the access they require to do what they need to do."
"I would recommend that others interested in the solution use it because it provides a user-friendly setup process. It's easy to navigate through the setup process."
"The solution has helped us improve all across the board. Everything that we did before PRM was a one-off. We shared the content back and forth through emails. Whenever there was a scope for training or enablement, a mail would be sent on the same. The solution has helped us scale where partners could use opportunities to get trained on our services and products."
"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."
"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."
"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."
"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."
"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."
"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."
"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."
"The best features Make offers include its very visual interface, which stands out for me."
 

Cons

"The business using the tool must be well-prepared in terms of partner strategy."
"I would like to see some easy ways in retrieving reports, data analytics, etc. The solution needs to be more specific from the data reporting perspective. It would make it easier to drill down by specific partners. It would be interesting to see some integrations and partnerships for the solution where they could make use of the account mapping tools."
"It would be helpful to have an improved reporting tool in the solution."
"I chose a nine out of ten because sometimes my browser gets crashed while working on Make, and I do not know why."
"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."
"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."
"Make has helped me save time positively, but I think there is room for improvement in Make as well."
"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."
"Pricing is definitely something that is on a higher tier where we are consuming around 1.5 to 2 million operations per month, which makes the bill quite substantial."
"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."
"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other competitor products."
"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Impartner PRM?
It was very inexpensive. It's in the cloud. You get the first 100 user licenses, and you can set that up. This was about 18 months to 2 years ago, for around $22,000 to $23,000. So, there are no up...
What needs improvement with Impartner PRM?
The business using the tool must be well-prepared in terms of partner strategy.
What advice do you have for others considering Impartner PRM?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I really liked using it because I had a sense that they understood the business.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

TreeHouse Interactive, Impartner, Impartner Reseller Demo Partner Management and Deal Registration Free Trial, Impartner ISV Demo Impartner PRM SaaS
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ViaWest, Workfront, National Instruments, Asigra, Sungard Availability Services, SGI, TECHT Paintball Products
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Impartner PRM vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.