

IIS and Microsoft System Center are two Microsoft products that compete in the domain of enterprise IT solutions. Based on feature comparisons, Microsoft System Center seems to have the upper hand due to its more extensive management capabilities despite its higher cost and complexity.
Features: IIS is celebrated for its ease of setup, user-friendliness, and robust performance. Its seamless integration with Windows allows for efficient deployment and management, making it a resource-efficient choice. Microsoft System Center is recognized for its comprehensive management capabilities, advanced automation features, and ease of integration with Windows Server roles, ideal for managing large-scale environments.
Room for Improvement: IIS requires advancements in security, integration with non-Microsoft products, and performance monitoring. Users find challenges in scaling, load balancing, and integrating with other programming languages. Microsoft System Center's areas for improvement include interface usability, ease of deployment, and better integration with third-party tools, with a need for more favorable pricing models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IIS and Microsoft System Center primarily offer on-premises deployments, with some cloud support. IIS is noted for straightforward deployment and efficient technical support, though some users lack comprehensive experiences. Microsoft System Center, while complex in deployment, benefits from dedicated technical support, although users report varied responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: IIS is cost-effective as it is bundled with Windows Server, requiring no additional licensing. This makes it an economical option for enterprises. Microsoft System Center, despite its higher cost, provides extensive management features that can offer substantial ROI, especially in larger environments, by enhancing scalability and management capabilities.
It should be more user-friendly overall, because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
There are typically no significant issues.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
I would rate the support from Microsoft very high because I definitely got all the help during the testing time of the development kit while we were configuring features on our on-premises server.
As a partner, I cannot create a ticket directly; I have to involve the end user's email to create one, so using the Software Assurance ID to create a ticket directly is not possible, making it very challenging for me.
Cloud solutions may have better scalability options compared to IIS.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
Microsoft System Center is scalable, allowing integration even if I have different sites.
It was secured for us, as we launched the product, and people were accessing it from India and Virginia, and we had no problem.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
You can check the memory consumption and the number of crashes.
It should be more user-friendly because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
Integrating Copilot could help automate processes or assist in identifying where to make actions or take actions on the server.
The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
We never had any pricing issue, but I don't know if it is competitive or not.
IIS is free.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
Entra ID functions as the security front-end for all user management and identity management with Azure.
In Microsoft System Center, all the features are integrated already, whereas in ManageEngine, you have to license each feature individually to access those features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IIS | 10.2% |
| Microsoft System Center | 1.9% |
| Other | 87.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.