No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Tomcat comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 8.7%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is 12.8%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 12.9%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tomcat12.9%
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)12.8%
IBM WebSphere Application Server8.7%
Other65.6%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

CF
Senior Manager, MW & DB Automation at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Has worked seamlessly in complex clustered environments and supports long-term development efforts
IBM WebSphere Application Server is currently at version 9.0.5.23. In recent months, they released fix 23, as they periodically release fixes. Previously, they frequently increased versions, but now they maintain 9.0.5 with different releases. It's based on Java J2EE 7 and Java SDK 1.8. Oracle announced that 2030 will be the last year when Java SDK 1.8 will be supported. Oracle currently deploys Java 2.x in parallel, with the latest being version 25. The future of IBM WebSphere Application Server remains uncertain since it's based on Java 1.8 and Java 7. I haven't found any white papers or official documentation from IBM outlining their trajectory post-2030.
reviewer2788512 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Rapid deployments have streamlined containerized web apps but support response still needs improvement
The best features Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) offers are its integration into AWS services, which is very helpful in containerization and application of Kubernetes specifically, and its user interface is very easy to use; we can deploy WAR files within stipulated time and also schedule deployments at a particular time, and it is easy to run the pipelines and integrate it with Jenkins. The most valuable feature for my team is containerization and Jenkins integration because Jenkins integration helps us eradicate code smells and build pipeline reports, and it also supports continuous CI/CD pipelining, while this orchestration aids in a microservice architecture where we will be using different types for it. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) has positively impacted my organization by helping in quickly making web Spring Boot applications and Java-based applications, and it is very easy to adapt and learn, plus it is open source with nominal and affordable subscription plans.
Sanjay Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Capgemini
Customization and flexibility enhance web applications while support effectively resolves queries
Regarding improvements in Tomcat, I personally haven't used it very extensively, but all Apache products are very useful for our web applications. Although the web server setup is a little different, it has everything we have been using, and as of now, everything is good with no deficiencies that need improvement. I think that Tomcat needs a more robust logging error details feature; the current logging feature is available, but it should be more user-friendly. This improvement would make error handling more user-friendly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product offers good performance."
"This solution is easy to use with a GUI that is intuitive and very helpful."
"If you want a product you can have confidence in, and a product with good availability, then IBM WebSphere Application Server is for you."
"The solution is very stable and robust."
"They offer good help to help resolve the issue."
"Once you deploy your application, it will be very stable with no issues at all."
"The solution has good performance."
"We needed this type of integration and WebShepere is the best tool for it."
"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."
"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."
"JBoss is easier to handle, and it can take on a much larger load compared to Tomcat."
"The solution is easy to use, and if I use Red Hat JBoss and Red Hat web server, I can do more configuration because I can control my webserver from the AP server without always logging in to the webserver to change or manage configurations."
"The support is fast and reliable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a plug-and-play solution, reducing the effort required to train users on its usage."
"The solution is stable, you can scale the solution, and there's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it supports Java Enterprise."
"The most valuable feature is the free EE server."
"We chose to use Tomcat because it's perfect compared to other containers that we have tested."
"We chose to use Tomcat because it's perfect compared to other containers that we have tested."
"The ease of use of Tomcat is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Tomcat is its ability to export libraries into different instances so that I can use it not only in one application but in multiple applications."
"The solution is readily available and open-source."
"From these experiences I can say that Tomcat is a really performing and PRODUCTION ready server."
 

Cons

"Some things are very difficult to do, so the interface and usage could be more intuitive for those."
"The future of IBM WebSphere Application Server remains uncertain since it's based on Java 1.8 and Java 7."
"The licensing could be improved, and I would like it to give the longevity of the lifespan of the visions."
"The availability of the solution needs improvement. The product should be more enhanced and responsive."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for the Arabic language."
"IBM needs to pay attention to market changes more quickly. We now have Java 9 and very soon Java EE8. We do not want to wait for two or three years after their release until they are supported by the new version."
"The main issue we faced was its limited compatibility with non-Java technologies, which can result in difficulty detecting potential bugs and requiring additional integration efforts."
"The computing resources required to run WAS could be reduced so that we can use a smaller virtual machine to run the application."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"The support should be bundled with the Red Hat OS support because as it is now, these are two separate costs."
"The application deployment sometimes can be a tedious task if you are a novice."
"It can have automation features."
"The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"The stability of the solution could improve with Microsoft Windows."
"Scalability is a major problem with Tomcat."
"The cluster management and load balancing is a bit complex."
"I have no recommendations for improvements."
"If Apache can come up with a better solution to provide better security, that would be ideal."
"In the solution, we are using the terminal to enter command line codes for operations and management, this is difficult for me. It would be better if we had some administrator UI tools for this."
"The high availability is not as robust as the competition is, such as WebLogic and Jboss."
"Sometimes we face issues with the private and public networks and ensuring that once Tomcat is installed, that it is secure."
"Java functions should be built better into the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It's expensive."
"We pay around $200,000 annually."
"IBM WAS base is part of the deal when you purchase IBM FileNet P8 Content Engine."
"It costs more than some of the others, but, you get what you pay for."
"When you purchase Maximo, you get WebSphere for free."
"The licensing policy is based on the PVU base."
"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."
"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."
"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."
"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."
"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."
"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."
"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."
"JBoss is an expensive solution."
"This is an open-source product and it's free to use."
"Tomcat is not costlier than other solutions."
"Tomcat's pricing is very cheap."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."
"It is an expensive product."
"Tomcat is an open source solution."
"It's open-source. We don't pay for the license."
"The price of the solution is good."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Government
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise23
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Application Server?
Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere App...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?
At Royal Bank, which is a major IBM customer with mainframes and numerous IBM products, they have a specific agreemen...
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?
IBM WebSphere Application Server is currently at version 9.0.5.23. In recent months, they released fix 23, as they pe...
What do you like most about JBoss?
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was nominal, and with the right guidance, it could have saved ...
What needs improvement with JBoss?
I think documentation may need improvement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). Additionally, the...
What do you like most about Tomcat?
Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go ...
What needs improvement with Tomcat?
Tomcat lacks a visual tool for configuring. Everything is from the command line. I would like a visual tool for confi...
What is your primary use case for Tomcat?
I work with Tomcat as a programmer, but not as an administrator. My major use case involves using Tomcat, mostly encl...
 

Also Known As

WebSphere Application Server
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League
Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE
1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.