IBM Spectrum Protect vs Teradata comparison

Read 76 Teradata reviews

118 Views
86 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Protect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Teradata and IBM Spectrum Protect are both prominent in the data processing and data management sectors. Teradata appears to have the upper hand in speed and analytics, while IBM Spectrum Protect excels in backup and recovery.

Features: Teradata offers Massive Parallel Processing for quick handling of large data volumes, advanced workload management, and effective partitioning options that ensure high performance and scalability. IBM Spectrum Protect provides comprehensive backup and recovery functions, featuring data deduplication, disaster recovery management, and compatibility with various platforms, enhancing its flexibility and storage capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Teradata could improve in transactional processing and cloud compatibility, with costs and integration complexity being other areas to address. IBM Spectrum Protect could enhance its user interface for better ease of use and improve cloud and virtual environment integration, while also simplifying its licensing approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata supports deployment in both public and hybrid clouds, accompanied by high customer satisfaction in technical support. IBM Spectrum Protect is mainly deployed on-premises but offers hybrid cloud options. Its users value technical expertise but desire quicker support response times.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata is seen as costly but delivers significant value for large enterprises requiring powerful analytics, achieving ROI through efficiency. IBM Spectrum Protect's pricing is also considered high, particularly for smaller businesses, but its enterprise-level features justify a favorable ROI for larger organizations, despite its complex licensing model.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Teradata Report (Updated: June 2025).

IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Teradata

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (5th), Data Integration (15th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (9th), Marketing Management (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Spectrum Protect is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Syed Habib

Head of Infrastructure Security (S.A.V.P) at EXIM Bank Ltd

Manageable and comprehensive and integrates robust backup features for core banking

It's adequate for my core banking, however, I am looking for another solution for all systems. It is not compatible with other operating systems like Windows or Linux, and lacks a consolidated dashboard from Browser Spectrum. This is why I am searching for another solution. The product also lacks any centralized graphical user interface (GUI), such as Jarek Pod, and I am limited to using a console-based text user interface, which my local partner handles completely.

Read full review

RajeshKumar25

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Harnessing advanced parallelism for top performance while embracing cloud trends

Teradata is primarily used for data warehousing across all customers. My clients have built-in applications that use Teradata, and their use varies from customer to customer, depending on the industry and database size. The primary function is as an OLAP analytical ecosystem Scalability is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Once it is completed properly, it is low maintenance. Most of the functions do not require much deliberation. It is all the blueprints and technologies laid out, and it is straight forward."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"Regarding technical support, if one has the entire enterprise support, I would rate it a nine out of ten...Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten."

"Every time customers make a change or we have made a change, then they use the product to do a cloning and refreshing. They are happy that they get good performance something changes."

"It scales from very small to very large. It is easily the most scalable product out there."

"It has a lot more capabilities and functions than a lot of other products. Even though it is more complex, the reason is because it gives you a lot more features. This is what I prefer, especially for a long retention."

"The solution is not complex, it's very easy to configure agents or VM backup and restore. Upgrades from one version to another are very fast and the product is very stable."

"Data reduction definitely reduces costs, not only software costs, but from the infrastructure needed."

More IBM Spectrum Protect pros

"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."

"The cloud is ten times better than physical hardware; it is more cost-effective and the upgrade process is ten times easier."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of running queries."

"It is a highly robust software solution."

"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."

"IntelliFlex is easy to scale - one of its best features is that you can upscale it to the size you want."

"The most valuable features are the Shared-nothing architecture and data protection functionality."

"The most valuable features of Teradata are that it is a massively parallel platform and I can receive a lot of data and get the queries out correctly, especially if it's been appropriately designed. The native features make it very suitable for multiple large data tasks in a structured data environment. Additionally, the automation is very good."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"The deduplication must be perfect, and thus should be improved."

"Its price can be better. It is very expensive. Its interface is very old and not user friendly. They can improve its interface. Their support can also be better. My clients are not very satisfied with the support because they are not really quick."

"It's adequate for my core banking, however, I am looking for another solution for all systems. It is not compatible with other operating systems like Windows or Linux, and lacks a consolidated dashboard from Browser Spectrum."

"I would like to see integration with Copy Data Management, which is an IBM product. Right now, these two products are siloed, so if these two become integrated, the product would become a bit of a powerhouse."

"For the database side, it does not have object level recovery."

"They need to do a better job on Windows, because if you are running Windows, the scalability is more limited than AIX and Linux."

"The stability could be improved."

"It has a lot of areas for improvement. Its reporting for job completion or incompletion can be improved. It should also provide a granular recovery, ease of operation, data life cycle management, and media management. It should support a backup in such a format that in case of a disaster, one can start the virtual machine out of the backup itself. Its reliability can also be better. It is also expensive, and their support is also poor."

More IBM Spectrum Protect cons

"If I want to implement an upgrade, I'd like to see how it will be different. Ideally, Data Lab should help me test production items and also do future things. Future releases should be downloadable and testable in Data Lab."

"The current operational approach needs improvement."

"Teradata is an old data warehouse, and they're not improving in terms of new, innovative features."

"It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI."

"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."

"Needs compatibility with more Big Data platforms."

"GUI of administrative tools is really outdated."

"Teradata's pricing is quite high compared to Redshift, Synapse, or GCP alternatives."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little expensive for our current employer, so they want to move to a cheaper solution."

"It is really expensive. Its price is not good for Latin America. Its price is good for the United States or Europe."

"Spectrum Protect is not expensive, and it is simple to use."

"That's a hard estimate. It depends on the licensing, the hardware, and other stuff, but it is fairly expensive. It is generally more expensive than other solutions."

"Regarding retro-compatibility of the product between versions, your data is always available and the ROI is unquestionable."

"The licensing fees are on a yearly basis, which for us it is about R400,000 (approximately $27,000 USD)."

"Use capacity licensing. It's easier and cheaper."

"We pay for a terabyte license to support our backend usage."

More IBM Spectrum Protect pricing and cost advice

"Teradata used to be expensive, but they have been lowering their prices."

"It's a very expensive product."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"I am using the free version of Teradata."

"In the past, it turned out that other solutions, in order to provide the full range of abilities that the Teradata platform provides plus the migration costs, would end up costing more than Teradata does."

"Teradata is currently making improvements in this area."

"The price of Teradata is on the higher side, and I think that it where they lose out on some of their business."

"We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Spectrum Protect?

IBM Spectrum Protect is stable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Protect?

It's expensive. I acknowledge the cost associated with it.

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Protect?

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 16% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Protect Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 13% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Download IBM Spectrum Protect product report

IBM Spectrum Protect

June 2025

Download Teradata product report

May 2025

Also Known As

IBM TSM, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) is a data protection platform that gives enterprises a single point of control and administration for backup and recovery. It is the flagship product in the IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) family. It enables reliable, cost effective backups and fast recovery for virtual, physical and cloud environments of all sizes.

IBM

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Sample Customers

CERN, Einstein Healthcare, Nyherji, Allianz Australia, TZM, ABT Online, NCT, Kindred Healthcare Inc., Cobalt Iron, TransGrid, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Cash America, Piedmont Healthcare, RWGV, Arkansas Tech University, British Columbia Institute of Technology

Netflix