IBM Spectrum Computing vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

IBM and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. IBM is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while VMware is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 1.1% mindshare in CM, compared to VMware’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 57% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

IBM Spectrum Computing

Read 9 IBM Spectrum Computing reviews

565 Views
350 Comparison Views

57% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,600 Views
896 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Computing

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM Spectrum Computing and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth compete in cloud management and optimization. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth seems to have an advantage with its extensive features, while IBM Spectrum Computing excels in pricing and support.

Features: IBM Spectrum Computing's workload management and resource allocation make it ideal for high computational tasks. It offers robust clustering capabilities and supports complex computational workflows. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers comprehensive cost management, detailed cloud spending insights, and forecasting for financial optimization. It excels in policy-driven resource management and offers extensive dashboards for better visibility across cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: IBM Spectrum Computing could improve in simplifying its compute resource management system and enhancing UI for easier use. More flexible integration with non-IBM systems would broaden its appeal. Enhanced documentation for complex features would be beneficial. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could improve its deployment speed, minimize learning curves for new users, and enhance support for third-party cloud platforms. Expanding its baseline features without additional costs could make it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Spectrum Computing is known for an easy deployment process, minimizing downtime with responsive customer service. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's deployment model involves a more complex setup due to its extensive features but offers supportive customer service focusing on detailed configuration guidance. Easy deployment and responsive support make IBM simpler, while VMWare offers a more intricate but supportive experience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Spectrum Computing is cost-effective for environments requiring robust computational power and offers a favorable ROI. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth may require a higher initial investment but pays off with its cost management capabilities and significant ROI through financial optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Computing

Ranking in Cloud Management

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (6th)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of IBM Spectrum Computing is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Senior Technical Specialist appreciates intelligent workload management, strong support, and scalability

The best features of IBM Spectrum Computing are common across many of their storage products. The software is solid, meaning that the code is stable. They take business seriously, which is what IBM stands for - International Business Machines. They always maintain a business-oriented approach in their software development. It's not simply clicking through interfaces; in IBM software, they consider their actions, process flows, and workflows around business processes. It requires understanding IBM and their methodology, as the software operates accordingly. I have utilized IBM Spectrum Computing's intelligent workload management feature. We use Insights, which is connected to the cloud. This provides AI capabilities for analyzing the configuration, offering smart recommendations on new code, warning about bugs in current code, and suggesting configuration improvements through its advisor tool. The predictive analytics feature in IBM Spectrum Computing enables optimal software performance through Insights. However, being a storage administrator requires foundational knowledge and understanding beyond these tools. For troubleshooting, it's efficient in spotting bottlenecks, but understanding the terms and metrics is essential as it provides answers that need interpretation.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis."

"This solution is working for both VTL and tape."

"The comparison was challenging, but the IBM Spectrum Scale offered a balanced solution. Our engineers rated itsanalytics capabilities equally high as Pure Storage. For workload management, Spectrum Computing provided effective solutions that met our needs. Workload management is part of a complete solution that uses different tools. There were the cloud and HPC parts; within HPC, there were parts like liquid cooling, simple computing, storage, and orchestration. The orchestration team handled the workload management."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is the policy driving resource management, to optimize the computing across data centers."

"Easy to operate and use."

"The best features of IBM Spectrum Computing are common across many of their storage products."

"We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues."

"The most valuable feature is the backup capability."

More IBM Spectrum Computing pros

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing."

"The deduplication software isn't quite up to speed with the market."

"We'd like to see some AI model training for machine learning."

"This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly."

"IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging."

"The deduplication software isn't quite up to speed with the market. While IBM has excellent compression technology, specifically on their FlashCore modules, they lag behind competitors such as NetApp in deduplication capabilities."

"In Pakistan, IBM's disadvantage is the lack of OEM support and presence."

"Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the cloud."

More IBM Spectrum Computing cons

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Spectrum Computing is one of the most expensive products on the market."

"This solution is expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Educational Organization

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Computing?

It is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Computing?

IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging. To work on an IBM deal, you often need to involve multiple specialists, each knowledgeable about only part of the product, rather than having a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Spectrum Computing?

It is big on resilience and security. Their focus is on providing robust and secure solutions. Due to their high-end server models, IBM products are often more expensive than competitors. While IBM...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudHealth?

The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

There could be flexibility in pricing for the product. They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size. It will help us get the right cost. Ad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

I rate VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 32% of the time

Cloudera Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 27% of the time

Morpheus vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 26% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Computing Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 9% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

July 2025

Download IBM Spectrum Computing product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

IBM Platform Computing

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

IBM

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

VMware

Sample Customers

London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, Genomic

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Spectrum Computing vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.