We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."This is a distributed application, meaning that a customer can stack small and then scale it so that they can expand pretty effectively. You can use, basically, the same product in an SMB or a large enterprise."
"I like the graphical interface. It's so good and easy."
"An engineer can live-monitor all the flow happening in real-time. This would help us a lot while investigating a case, and it would even help us with preventive actions."
"The most valuable features are all the implementations, the plug-ins, and the User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."
"IBM has everything you need in a cybersecurity solution. If you want to build a cybersecurity operation center version then I think QRadar is a perfect solution."
"It helps us discover any threats with their alerts and tracking."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"The detection rate is good and the false positive rate is low."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"You can scale IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, but it has room for improvement."
"AI is superb but need improvements."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"Pricing model could be more cost-effective."
"The AQL queries could be better."
"IBM Qradar could improve the reporting. The tool is not designed to report. It's a great operational monitoring tool. You put it on a screen and you watch it. If you want to have analytics out of it, that's a whole different story. You're going to need more people and tools. What should be added is reporting and integration into Power BI, into some capability that produces analytical reports from the source data. IBM does not seem to care to add these features."
"There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.