We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Power Admin PA File Sight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The tool is already automated in many ways, but there are some additional functions which should be automated, like sending an email, mobile notification, and integration of XFS."
"Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution."
"The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable."
"We can easily monitor many things using this tool."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is how it monitors the real network. That is its leading security feature."
"Most valuable features include the granularity of information."
"One of the most valuable features is its ability to integrate with other solutions. IBM has a lot of solutions and we have managed to make it work with IBM BigFix and MaaS360, and even Microsoft."
"Overall a great solution."
"The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"I don't give it a 10 because it is something we have to request. I would love it if UBA was included out of the box like Microsoft."
"There is one problem with QRadar in regards to the add-on apps. The apps can be frustrating. For example, when I add a big app like one of the add-ons for resiliency, add-on applications for QRadar, these applications require different hardware to implement and to deploy. The resiliency connector because there's a considerable amount of data scanning, operates for these apps correctly."
"The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search."
"If you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. You need to have more storage."
"Their technical support is not good. We opened a lot of cases and from my experience, they are not complicated issues but it takes forever to get an answer."
"They need to improve their threat intelligence feed and they need to improve their user behavior analytics modules."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.