IBM DevOps Test UI vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #27, while Oracle is ranked #25. IBM holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

1,203 Views
998 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,049 Views
1,147 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM DevOps Test UI and Oracle Application Testing Suite are competing in the software testing domain. IBM DevOps Test UI appears to have the upper hand due to its pricing and support advantages.

Features: IBM DevOps Test UI supports robust integration with DevOps pipelines, offers real-time analytics, and facilitates automated test execution. Oracle Application Testing Suite provides comprehensive test management, rich automation tools, and caters to complex applications.

Room for Improvement: IBM DevOps Test UI could enhance its feature set to compete better in depth against Oracle. Oracle Application Testing Suite may improve by simplifying its deployment and reducing resource intensity, making it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DevOps Test UI excels in straightforward deployment across diverse environments, complemented by swift customer service. Oracle requires complex deployment but benefits from a dedicated support team.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DevOps Test UI is a cost-effective solution with a promising ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher setup cost but offers potentially superior ROI through its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (13th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (13th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.6%
IBM DevOps Test UI	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester, which analyzes the changes in UI elements and allows me to automatically adapt and change my automation testing."

"The technical support is good; at least their response time is good, and whenever we ask them for help regarding deployment customizations, custom code implementation, or other code needs, they heavily support us, assign us IT engineers who work alongside us helping with code-related issues, and stay until the problem is resolved."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"It is 100% compatible with all sorts of database integrations and is compatible with all types of open source TFT-based applications, which makes it a great product to have."

"It helps in automation by using better object recognition as compared to other tools in the market."

"By automating regression test suites using this product, we were able to show time savings of more than 1200 hours in less than ONE year."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

More IBM DevOps Test UI pros

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature, the recording feature is the prime feature that open script has, and I also like the connectivity with Oracle Forms as it is very compatible."

"For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"It's user friendly and in-built API support makes it very easy to automate or develop an automation framework."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly."

"Overall, Oracle Application Testing Suite is very easy to use and you can create a good framework for developing and testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"The object repository used for identifying objects can be made better. It has been noticed that the RFT tool is unable to identify some objects, due to which we are unable to add them to the object repository."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"It does not fully justify being a paid tool, and it needs improvement."

"If you look at today's current context, I wouldn't recommend RFT because there are far more advanced solutions and products available."

"If in the future there is no support for mobile applications, then we will be using it less."

More IBM DevOps Test UI cons

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"WebForms works fine, but scripting in the EBS forms option isn't very consistent and stable."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Room for improvement would be for the reporting features. If they could improve the dashboards, that would be helpful."

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 8% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

OATS

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Edumate

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.