"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 6.6, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Easy to use, good central test repository, and responsive technical support". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Ranorex Studio, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Apache JMeter and Katalon Studio.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.