IBM DevOps Test UI vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #29, while Oracle is ranked #25. IBM holds a 1.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

680 Views
530 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,430 Views
815 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM DevOps Test UI and Oracle Application Testing Suite are competing in the software testing domain. IBM DevOps Test UI appears to have the upper hand due to its pricing and support advantages.

Features: IBM DevOps Test UI supports robust integration with DevOps pipelines, offers real-time analytics, and facilitates automated test execution. Oracle Application Testing Suite provides comprehensive test management, rich automation tools, and caters to complex applications.

Room for Improvement: IBM DevOps Test UI could enhance its feature set to compete better in depth against Oracle. Oracle Application Testing Suite may improve by simplifying its deployment and reducing resource intensity, making it more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DevOps Test UI excels in straightforward deployment across diverse environments, complemented by swift customer service. Oracle requires complex deployment but benefits from a dedicated support team.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DevOps Test UI is a cost-effective solution with a promising ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher setup cost but offers potentially superior ROI through its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

29th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (13th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.3%
IBM DevOps Test UI	1.0%
Other	97.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 22% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 22% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 33% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

August 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

OATS

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Edumate

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

August 2025

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.