IBM Power Systems vs Lenovo Edge Servers comparison

IBM and Lenovo are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Lenovo is ranked #12. IBM holds a 7.5% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Lenovo’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

IBM Power Systems

Read 73 IBM Power Systems reviews

3,565 Views
3,565 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Lenovo Edge Servers

Read 2 Lenovo Edge Servers reviews

426 Views
426 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Power Systems

Lenovo Edge Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

IBM Power Systems and Lenovo Edge Servers are significant in the high-performance computing market. Lenovo appears to have an advantage due to its flexibility and integration capabilities with edge computing solutions.

Features: IBM Power Systems emphasize robust performance, scalability for enterprises, and reliability. They are designed to effectively handle demanding workloads. Lenovo Edge Servers, in contrast, offer flexibility through seamless IoT integration, adaptability in diverse computing environments, and versatile deployment options.

Room for Improvement: IBM Power Systems could benefit from incorporating newer technologies, offering greater user customization, and enhancing innovation strategies. Lenovo Edge Servers users suggest improved support documentation, better troubleshooting resources, and more comprehensive user guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Power Systems are noted for a structured deployment process, though customer support responsiveness varies. Lenovo Edge Servers are praised for simple deployment facilitated by modular architecture, though users would appreciate more proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Power Systems often involve higher upfront costs but promise strong long-term ROI due to performance and reliability. Lenovo Edge Servers offer a cost-effective initial investment with flexible pricing models, providing satisfactory ROI through lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Power Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lenovo Edge Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of IBM Power Systems is 7.5%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lenovo Edge Servers is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Power Systems	7.5%
Lenovo Edge Servers	1.5%
Other	91.0%

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Foluso Jibowo

Product Manager at Hiperdist Ltd

Has empowered enterprises with secure and cost-effective solutions

When discussing disadvantages, I do not see many areas for improvement because we have received good testimonies from every client. IBM gives customers peace of mind. One challenge, which I would not really call a challenge, is that initially people have the notion that IBM Power Systems is quite expensive. However, IBM does not lose deals based on price. This is a message we need to keep communicating to people who feel that IBM is on the high side in terms of cost. We encourage them to have a discussion with us about their total cost of ownership over three or five years. There is a notion in the market that IBM is expensive, which is false. However, once we engage and show them their return on investments and their total cost of ownership savings, they tend to embrace IBM.

Read full review

Hawi Nadew

Data center and cloud solution engineer at IE Network Solutions PLC

A budget-friendly tool that offers good stability

I don't have much to comment on what requires improvement in the product because my company is more engaged with Dell's servers than Lenovo's ones. I'm not that much familiar with Lenovo. My company has seen that the servers from Lenovo offer good performance and high scalability, so I don't see any scope for improvement in the solution. With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile. With ThinkAgile in the picture, there are two different vendors, Lenovo and VMware. Suppose VMware and Lenovo come together, then they produce a common product. In the case of the servers under Lenovo, the virtualization software is again both from VMware and Dell, and the licenses are deployed on the server. Different vendors manage the servers from Lenovo that fall under ThinkAgile and VMware, so if there is a way that allows Lenovo and VMware to produce a system together like ThinKAgile, then it would be a good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Power Systems are secure and have fast processing."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Power Systems is its performance."

"Power runs our resilient data systems, our high-end databases, stuff that can't go down."

"We have had a good experience with the technical support team at IBM."

"IBM Power Systems are more capable because they have their own file system, CPUs, and accelerators, making them more capable than the other OEMs."

"It scales a lot, you can just keep on adding frames, you can add on CPUs, you get capacity on demand, you can tune the machine very easily to handle different workloads."

"When it comes to reliability, availability and profitability, nothing can beat IBM Power Systems."

"From a software developer standpoint, virtualization is really the key, as we can more easily spin up a new partition, virtual instance of IBM i."

More IBM Power Systems pros

"It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability."

"I like Lenovo's XClarity Controller, and the ability to control and deploy Edge Servers through this XClarity interface."

Cons

"The solution could improve the memory database for better integration with SAP HANA."

"One of the main challenges with IBM Power Systems is the functionality of live partnership mobility."

"Price and complexity related to the management of the solution are areas of concern in the solution where improvements are required."

"The price is a bit high and could be improved."

"IBM should provide a platform where users can learn about the storage and security of IBM Power Systems."

"I would like to see IBM Power Systems integrate with all cloud types."

"Everyone likes speed. Not that speed has been an issue up until now but you can never be too fast."

"The pricing of the product could always be lowered."

More IBM Power Systems cons

"Airflow in the servers can be a problem. Sometimes we cannot add CPU to Edge Servers because there's not enough airflow in the appliance."

"With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is designed for a large workload, as opposed to a small workload. For our circumstances, and even as an independent, I can't buy a Power system to experiment on. It can't happen. You cannot buy them."

"The price of IBM Power Systems is expensive and could improve."

"Price-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"When there is an error in the SAS drive of 10,000 RPM, my company buys support for 1,500 USD."

"The licensing costs are okay. With IBM Power Systems, it's inclusive, so you can differentiate the price of the hardware from the software itself."

"Power Systems is very cheap and provides good value for money."

"IBM Power Systems is a really expensive product."

More IBM Power Systems pricing and cost advice

"The solution is available to users at a low price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	42

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Power Systems?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems are used mainly in large organizations, generally in the financial industry, government, telecommunications, oil and gas sectors for their high availability environment. These sys...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 25% of the time

Intel Server System vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 17% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Power Systems Competitors

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 49% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XR-Series vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 13% of the time

Intel Server System vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 10% of the time

More Lenovo Edge Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems

January 2026

Download IBM Power Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2026

Download Lenovo Edge Servers product report

Also Known As

IBM OpenPOWER LC

ThinkSystem Edge Servers, ThinkSystem SE Series, Lenovo SE Series, Lenovo ThinkSystem Edge Servers

Overview

IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

IBM

Designed and built with the unique requirements for Edge servers in mind, it is versatile enough to stretch the limitations of server locations, providing a variety of connectivity and security options and easily managed with Lenovo XClarity Controller. The ThinkSystem SE350 is a rugged compact-sized Edge solution with a focus on smart connectivity, business security, and manageability for the harsh environment.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

Cipher

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.