IBM Power Systems vs Lenovo Edge Servers comparison

IBM and Lenovo are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Lenovo is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 8.7% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Lenovo’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

IBM Power Systems

Read 72 IBM Power Systems reviews

3,714 Views
3,714 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Lenovo Edge Servers

Read 2 Lenovo Edge Servers reviews

346 Views
346 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Power Systems

Lenovo Edge Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

IBM Power Systems and Lenovo Edge Servers are significant in the high-performance computing market. Lenovo appears to have an advantage due to its flexibility and integration capabilities with edge computing solutions.

Features: IBM Power Systems emphasize robust performance, scalability for enterprises, and reliability. They are designed to effectively handle demanding workloads. Lenovo Edge Servers, in contrast, offer flexibility through seamless IoT integration, adaptability in diverse computing environments, and versatile deployment options.

Room for Improvement: IBM Power Systems could benefit from incorporating newer technologies, offering greater user customization, and enhancing innovation strategies. Lenovo Edge Servers users suggest improved support documentation, better troubleshooting resources, and more comprehensive user guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Power Systems are noted for a structured deployment process, though customer support responsiveness varies. Lenovo Edge Servers are praised for simple deployment facilitated by modular architecture, though users would appreciate more proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Power Systems often involve higher upfront costs but promise strong long-term ROI due to performance and reliability. Lenovo Edge Servers offer a cost-effective initial investment with flexible pricing models, providing satisfactory ROI through lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Power Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lenovo Edge Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of IBM Power Systems is 8.7%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lenovo Edge Servers is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Power Systems	8.7%
Lenovo Edge Servers	1.0%
Other	90.3%

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Foluso Jibowo

Product Manager at Hiperdist Ltd

Has empowered enterprises with secure and cost-effective solutions

When discussing disadvantages, I do not see many areas for improvement because we have received good testimonies from every client. IBM gives customers peace of mind. One challenge, which I would not really call a challenge, is that initially people have the notion that IBM Power Systems is quite expensive. However, IBM does not lose deals based on price. This is a message we need to keep communicating to people who feel that IBM is on the high side in terms of cost. We encourage them to have a discussion with us about their total cost of ownership over three or five years. There is a notion in the market that IBM is expensive, which is false. However, once we engage and show them their return on investments and their total cost of ownership savings, they tend to embrace IBM.

Read full review

Hawi Nadew

Data center and cloud solution engineer at IE Network Solutions PLC

A budget-friendly tool that offers good stability

I don't have much to comment on what requires improvement in the product because my company is more engaged with Dell's servers than Lenovo's ones. I'm not that much familiar with Lenovo. My company has seen that the servers from Lenovo offer good performance and high scalability, so I don't see any scope for improvement in the solution. With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile. With ThinkAgile in the picture, there are two different vendors, Lenovo and VMware. Suppose VMware and Lenovo come together, then they produce a common product. In the case of the servers under Lenovo, the virtualization software is again both from VMware and Dell, and the licenses are deployed on the server. Different vendors manage the servers from Lenovo that fall under ThinkAgile and VMware, so if there is a way that allows Lenovo and VMware to produce a system together like ThinKAgile, then it would be a good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to reliability, availability and profitability, nothing can beat IBM Power Systems."

"Additionally, the processing power is far superior, especially with the RSA feature for reliability, serviceability, and availability."

"Active Memory Expansion allows you to compress your memory on the run time to allow you to have less physical memory available, but provision more memory to your partitions, as everything will be compressed on the fly."

"IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors."

"From a reliability standpoint it has provided us with excellent performance."

"The virtualization and the quality you get from it is one reason we like the solution."

"The performance and stability are great."

"We found working with IBM Power Systems that LPM is the most valuable feature."

More IBM Power Systems pros

"It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability."

"I like Lenovo's XClarity Controller, and the ability to control and deploy Edge Servers through this XClarity interface."

Cons

"The price is a bit high and could be improved."

"I know lab services does a lot of work but systems, if they could include some kind of lab services and bundling of services to get you to the greatest and latest feature at the already included cost"

"Technical support and documentation need to be improved."

"The scalability process should be simplified."

"Software testing and the compatibility of software products that are available in the market should be addressed."

"We have a problem with the storage software. The media to restore data is also not found."

"Better manage heterogeneous footprints of all the different operating systems that are out there across one common interface."

"IBM systems are old technologies. I couldn't renew and get to use IBM Power Systems, and it offers users very expensive support."

More IBM Power Systems cons

"Airflow in the servers can be a problem. Sometimes we cannot add CPU to Edge Servers because there's not enough airflow in the appliance."

"With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When there is an error in the SAS drive of 10,000 RPM, my company buys support for 1,500 USD."

"The price of IBM Power Systems is expensive and could improve."

"It's more about the value you get for the price. Considering its stability and performance, the pricing is good."

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and it's an expensive solution."

"IBM Power Systems is very expensive."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"Price-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten."

"The cost model is great. There is so much built in to the technology, that if you know how to use it you can save yourself a lot of money."

More IBM Power Systems pricing and cost advice

"The solution is available to users at a low price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	42

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Power Systems?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems are used mainly in large organizations, generally in the financial industry, government, telecommunications, oil and gas sectors for their high availability environment. These sys...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lenovo Edge Servers?

It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lenovo Edge Servers?

The solution is available to users at a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lenovo Edge Servers?

See all answers

Comparisons

Intel Server System vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 30% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 17% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Power Systems Competitors

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 81% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 19% of the time

More Lenovo Edge Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems

September 2025

Download IBM Power Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

October 2025

Download Lenovo Edge Servers product report

Also Known As

IBM OpenPOWER LC

ThinkSystem Edge Servers, ThinkSystem SE Series, Lenovo SE Series, Lenovo ThinkSystem Edge Servers

Overview

IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

IBM

Designed and built with the unique requirements for Edge servers in mind, it is versatile enough to stretch the limitations of server locations, providing a variety of connectivity and security options and easily managed with Lenovo XClarity Controller. The ThinkSystem SE350 is a rugged compact-sized Edge solution with a focus on smart connectivity, business security, and manageability for the harsh environment.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

Cipher

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

September 2025

Free Report: IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.