IBM Power Systems vs Lenovo Edge Servers comparison

IBM and Lenovo are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Lenovo is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 9.0% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Lenovo’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

IBM Power Systems

Read 71 IBM Power Systems reviews

3,981 Views
3,981 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Lenovo Edge Servers

Read 2 Lenovo Edge Servers reviews

346 Views
346 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Power Systems

Lenovo Edge Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

IBM Power Systems and Lenovo Edge Servers are significant in the high-performance computing market. Lenovo appears to have an advantage due to its flexibility and integration capabilities with edge computing solutions.

Features: IBM Power Systems emphasize robust performance, scalability for enterprises, and reliability. They are designed to effectively handle demanding workloads. Lenovo Edge Servers, in contrast, offer flexibility through seamless IoT integration, adaptability in diverse computing environments, and versatile deployment options.

Room for Improvement: IBM Power Systems could benefit from incorporating newer technologies, offering greater user customization, and enhancing innovation strategies. Lenovo Edge Servers users suggest improved support documentation, better troubleshooting resources, and more comprehensive user guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Power Systems are noted for a structured deployment process, though customer support responsiveness varies. Lenovo Edge Servers are praised for simple deployment facilitated by modular architecture, though users would appreciate more proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Power Systems often involve higher upfront costs but promise strong long-term ROI due to performance and reliability. Lenovo Edge Servers offer a cost-effective initial investment with flexible pricing models, providing satisfactory ROI through lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Power Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lenovo Edge Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of IBM Power Systems is 9.0%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lenovo Edge Servers is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Rohintan-Karanjia

Advisory Services at Nangia Andersen LLP

Offers security features, including HIPs, Postgres, intrusion prevention systems, and AI for specific tasks

We've found that sometimes, certain setups require better servers. Ideally, the next level of model that IBM offers would be perfect for those situations. Sometimes, the availability of additional services can be a challenge for some software. Certain IBM software takes time to deliver to the client. It can be slow. So deployment is an area for improvement.

Read full review

Hawi Nadew

Data center and cloud solution engineer at IE Network Solutions PLC

A budget-friendly tool that offers good stability

I don't have much to comment on what requires improvement in the product because my company is more engaged with Dell's servers than Lenovo's ones. I'm not that much familiar with Lenovo. My company has seen that the servers from Lenovo offer good performance and high scalability, so I don't see any scope for improvement in the solution. With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile. With ThinkAgile in the picture, there are two different vendors, Lenovo and VMware. Suppose VMware and Lenovo come together, then they produce a common product. In the case of the servers under Lenovo, the virtualization software is again both from VMware and Dell, and the licenses are deployed on the server. Different vendors manage the servers from Lenovo that fall under ThinkAgile and VMware, so if there is a way that allows Lenovo and VMware to produce a system together like ThinKAgile, then it would be a good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."

"Power VM gives us the flexibility to increase or decrease machine resources when required."

"We value the stability and technology capability of this solution the most. It is very stable, and the processor technology of IBM is very good. When you have a CIO and you are dealing with C-level every day, you can, without any doubt, support the core banking or critical applications with this solution."

"Some of the most valuable features are the processing power, stability, and security."

"The solution does not require any maintenance."

"We have had a good experience with the technical support team at IBM."

"It scales a lot, you can just keep on adding frames, you can add on CPUs, you get capacity on demand, you can tune the machine very easily to handle different workloads."

"The best features of the solution are its robustness and service level."

More IBM Power Systems pros

"I like Lenovo's XClarity Controller, and the ability to control and deploy Edge Servers through this XClarity interface."

"It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability."

Cons

"IBM Power Systems could improve by having a cloud feature."

"One of the features that we would like, and I think they are also adapting to the latest trends in the market, is to make it more open, more flexible... With VMware, anybody can create a virtual machine without any knowledge of the server side. But with AIX it's a bit difficult."

"The lack of software vendors moving onto the platform, as opposed to fleeing the platform, is an issue."

"IBM systems are old technologies. I couldn't renew and get to use IBM Power Systems, and it offers users very expensive support."

"I think IBM needs a little more work on managing the overall environment with eliminating Systems Director."

"In the next release, I would like to see additional graphical dashboards to help the administrators access information more easily."

"The pricing is high."

"No available price list is on the web. Due to this, the customer cannot compare pricing."

More IBM Power Systems cons

"Airflow in the servers can be a problem. Sometimes we cannot add CPU to Edge Servers because there's not enough airflow in the appliance."

"With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is too high."

"The additional software costs are high."

"The price of the solution could be somewhat better and this is what lowers my rating of it to a seven or eight out of ten."

"IBM Power is more expensive than other rack-mount servers, and you have to have a license for everything, including cores and memory."

"The solution's pricing is very, very high compared to other platforms."

"The machine is good and has a comparatively good price."

"Power Systems is a bit more costly than other products in the market, but in terms of ROI and the longevity, performance, and reliability that Power Systems provides, it's worth it in the long run."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More IBM Power Systems pricing and cost advice

"The solution is available to users at a low price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Power Systems?

There are definitely areas for improvement, but that's not really from the technological side of things. I rarely find any people with Power skills on the market. When I get young people from unive...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Power Systems?

I use IBM Power Systems for online transactional processing, and in parts, also for online analytical processing. We mainly use IBM Power Systems' IBMI, which is an operating system with an integra...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lenovo Edge Servers?

It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lenovo Edge Servers?

The solution is available to users at a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lenovo Edge Servers?

See all answers

Comparisons

Intel Server System vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 38% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 19% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 16% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Power Systems Competitors

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 53% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 26% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 11% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 10% of the time

More Lenovo Edge Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems

August 2025

Download IBM Power Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

August 2025

Download Lenovo Edge Servers product report

Also Known As

IBM OpenPOWER LC

ThinkSystem Edge Servers, ThinkSystem SE Series, Lenovo SE Series, Lenovo ThinkSystem Edge Servers

Overview

IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

IBM

Designed and built with the unique requirements for Edge servers in mind, it is versatile enough to stretch the limitations of server locations, providing a variety of connectivity and security options and easily managed with Lenovo XClarity Controller. The ThinkSystem SE350 is a rugged compact-sized Edge solution with a focus on smart connectivity, business security, and manageability for the harsh environment.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

Cipher

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo Edge Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.