IBM OpenPages vs Snyk comparison

IBM and Snyk are both solutions in the GRC category. IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Snyk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 4.5% mindshare in G, compared to Snyk’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

IBM OpenPages

Read 8 IBM OpenPages reviews

1,311 Views
1,206 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 49 Snyk reviews

19,965 Views
200 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM OpenPages

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2025

IBM OpenPages and Snyk are competing products in the risk management and security domains. IBM OpenPages has an upper hand in risk management and compliance, while Snyk excels in offering a robust developer-first security integration.

Features: IBM OpenPages includes strong governance and risk management capabilities, custom risk assessments, policy management, and regulatory compliance tools. Snyk provides powerful vulnerability scanning, open-source security management, and seamless CI/CD pipeline integration.

Room for Improvement: IBM OpenPages could benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing user-interface intuitiveness. It could also expand its integrations with third-party platforms. Snyk can improve by expanding its vulnerability database and providing more comprehensive licensing checks. Enhancing its on-premise setup could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM OpenPages requires a detailed deployment setup, often needing specialized IT support, and benefits from IBM’s structured customer service. Snyk offers a simplified deployment with strong integration capabilities and agile customer support, appealing to fast-paced development environments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM OpenPages involves high setup costs but provides significant ROI through extensive risk management. Snyk presents a more flexible cost structure, focusing on rapid ROI through immediate security enhancements and vulnerability reduction.

To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GRC

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM OpenPages

Ranking in GRC

7th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (2nd)

Snyk

Ranking in GRC

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (18th), Application Security Tools (6th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (14th), Vulnerability Management (14th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (15th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 4.5%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 1.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Snyk	1.4%
IBM OpenPages	4.5%
Other	94.1%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Badri Anand Santhanam

Senior Risk Advisory Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Enhancing enterprise risk management and reporting capabilities with insightful dashboards and automated features.

IBM OpenPages offers strong reporting capabilities with Cognos integration, providing standard tabular reports, various charts, and powerful dashboards for different lines of defense. It caters to the first line managing risks and controls, the second line of SMEs providing oversight, and the independent audit function with an internal audit management module. The solution is more intuitive and task-based, allowing better involvement of the risk function across different lines of defense. The automated features translate into reporting capabilities, and data can be easily extracted and downloaded in different formats.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

I lead a code security practice for our organization. We integrated Snyk into our GitHub, using CLI to automatically scan codebases and identify issues. We are a large organization with three independent entities, consolidating Snyk across all entities. We also provide access through numerous…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."

"IBM OpenPages saves time in my work as a developer."

"The most valuable features are the workflow engine, calculations, and security rules."

"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."

"IBM OpenPages provides time savings in recording risk management components."

"Everything about IBM OpenPages is valuable, particularly when compared to other solutions in the market like MetricStream, from which we switched due to its feasibility, user-friendliness, and performance."

"We're loving some of the Kubernetes integration as well. That's really quite cool. It's still in the early days of our use of it, but it looks really exciting. In the Kubernetes world, it's very good at reporting on the areas around the configuration of your platform, rather than the things that you've pulled in. There's some good advice there that allows you to prioritize whether something is important or just worrying. That's very helpful."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."

"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."

"There are many valuable features. For example, the way the scanning feature works. The integration is cool because I can integrate it and I don't need to wait until the CACD, I can plug it in to our local ID, and there I can do the scanning. That is the part I like best."

"The solution's vulnerability database, in terms of comprehensiveness and accuracy, is very high-level. As far as I know, it's the best among their competitors."

"It's very easy for developers to use. Onboarding was an easy process for all of the developers within the company. After a quick, half-an-hour to an hour session, they were fully using it on their own. It's very straightforward. Usability is definitely a 10 out of 10."

"The most valuable feature of Snyk is the SBOM."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"IBM needs to work on pricing for organizations with around 100 users, as the licensing model is not competitive enough for SMEs."

"IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors."

"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."

"Some self-relationships are not available in OpenPages' relationship model."

"It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations."

"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."

"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."

"We use Bamboo for CI.CD, and we had problems integrating Snyk with it. Ultimately, we got the two solutions to work together, but it was difficult."

"The tool's initial use is complex."

"The tool should provide more flexibility and guidance to help us fix the top vulnerabilities before we go into production."

"We have seen cases where tools didn't find or recognize certain dependencies. These are known issues, to some extent, due to the complexity in the language or stack that you using. There are some certain circumstances where the tool isn't actually finding what it's supposed to be finding, then it could be misleading."

"I think Snyk should add more of a vulnerability protection feature in the tool since it is an area where it lacks."

"We were using Microsoft Docker images. It was reporting some vulnerabilities, but we were not able to figure out the fix for them. It was reporting some vulnerabilities in the Docker images given by Microsoft, which were out of our control. That was the only limitation. Otherwise, it was good."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"The product has good pricing."

"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

"Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM OpenPages?

The product’s interface is very intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors. Additionally, although there are risk assessment tools, I do n...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

I primarily use IBM OpenPages ( /products/ibm-openpages-reviews ) for compliance and audit programs.

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

RSA Archer vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 39% of the time

MetricStream vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 26% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 12% of the time

SAS Enterprise GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 6% of the time

AuditBoard vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GRC

September 2025

Download IBM OpenPages product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

September 2025

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

OpenPages

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

IBM

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.