IBM Db2 on Cloud vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
370 views|315 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,317 views|5,249 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Db2 on Cloud and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reliability is the most valuable feature. It is also user-friendly."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Pros →

"The initial setup is very easy. It's extremely straightforward.""The solution has become easier to use over time and it's also reasonably priced.""The most valuable feature from the infra point of view is you don't have to keep any on-prem infrastructure, it is available all the time whenever you want to access it.""Great auto-scaling and security features.""The most valuable features of SQL Azure are its reliability and quick scalability.""The solution is quite straightforward to set up.""The product's initial setup phase is very easy.""Emergency mode is quite useful."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"I would give their support a ten if they had more tutorials available."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Cons →

"In terms of support, they don't give much support.""The initial setup was very complex.""Azure SQL can improve by adding more machine learning features like other databases, such as Cassandra or Cosmos DB.""Microsoft could improve its documentation and support.""Their availability in the Middle East and Asia regions needs to improve.""I need something which is in one place so I can automate the Azure data factory, but it's a different tool. It's not easy and in one place, so I can't switch to the other tool and do something there, automate everything there in the on-prem infrastructure, and then have everything in the agent. I can just pick one packet and use it. However, I want to be able to click it and run it.""The way it has been designed, in the on-premises deployments, the underlying Windows OS is highly scalable but has a very large resource requirement. A lot of power-related and memory-related things are there, which I have not seen in the RHEL and Oracle. I have not tried SQL on RHEL EXEC. On Windows, infrastructure-wise, a very large workload is running on the SQL. This issue is related to Windows, not SQL.""Their support is nice but their responses aren't effective."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    370
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    Views
    11,317
    Comparisons
    5,249
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    A fully-managed cloud SQL database. Powered by a turbo-charged Db2 engine.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Owens-Illinois, KONE Corp., Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue, Canon Europe, Delhaize America, Wimbledon
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    University12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Db2 on Cloud is ranked 12th in Database as a Service while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. IBM Db2 on Cloud is rated 9.0, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 on Cloud writes "Reliable and user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". IBM Db2 on Cloud is most compared with Google Cloud SQL and Amazon RDS, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service and vCloud Air.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.