We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Compliance with the BPMN 2.0 standard."
"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."
"It's a solid product. It covers most of the pain points for clients."
"The most valuable feature for the organization is the Document Store."
"One of the reasons for adopting this solution ten years ago was its ease of use. It had a lot of off-the-shelf functionality, and it did not need to be developed specifically for the project that we were implementing. That was the main reason for adopting it in the beginning."
"This solution is very stable."
"The performance is fine."
"It provides a very robust environment to build an integration framework or workflow patterns that we have. A lot of changes or modifications have been made to this solution over the past few years. The features that they have added this time have helped developers like us to work on the developmental environment and leverage all the capabilities of the tool. This is what I like about this solution."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients."
"The configuration is not that easy, and the initial deployment took three months."
"The options for customization could be improved. More customization using your own code would be beneficial."
"Finding errors and bugs on the system is not easy. We can't seem to use the events or logs to find them, so it makes it difficult to debug the system. They really need to work on their debugging features to make is much, much easier. It would improve the solution considerably and should be something they add in a future release."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"New users will need at least six months to get comfortable with IBM BPM, at least initially. So, there's a learning curve."
"UI is an area with a shortcoming that needs improvement."
"The pricing is a little bit high. It's gone up in cost."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 36th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS. See our IBM BPM vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
