We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."
"I like the administration part."
"My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."
"It's very convenient and very innovative."
"The main feature is that the processes are very flexible, they are able to be adapted to the business and their departments."
"SAP HANA is a stable solution."
"SAP HANA's best features are its programmability and extensibility - you can size and shape the software however you need."
"Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for."
"We like that the product is both vertically and horizontally scalable, allowing us to do around 86 percent compression of documentation from 50 to seven terabytes."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"It is very flexible to integrate with SaaS components."
"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."
"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."
"It is challenging to integrate it with third-party tools."
"SAP HANA's long run time to extract data could be improved upon."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM."
"Per SAP, you can do both transactional and analytical processes in SAP HANA. Though that's true, the speed is slower when you combine the two functions, so this is what I'd like SAP to improve in SAP HANA. In the next release, I want to see better diagrams in SAP HANA and a more user-friendly interface."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"The solution is very expensive for us."
"The worst thing about SAP HANA is the price; it's very expensive. The licensing cost, implementation cost, hosting cost, and appliance cost are all high."
HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is ranked 5th in Hadoop with 12 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 1st in Embedded Database with 79 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric writes "It's flexible and easily accessible across multiple locations, but the upgrade process is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is most compared with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Amazon EMR, IBM Spectrum Computing, MongoDB and Netezza Analytics, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.