We performed a comparison between HPE All-Flash Storage and NetApp NVMe AFF A800 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is fast and reliable. It works."
"It's very fast and very easy to use. It performs well and is both flexible and compatible. We like it because it's easy to use."
"Its array houses our entire production environment."
"The most valuable feature is its data reduction."
"Lone segmentation is simpler and more agile. It's improved the velocity in overall provisioning from project to operation."
"Running SAP on Pure Storage helps a lot without doing any further tuning to improve application performance. Our internal clients are happy."
"The most valuable feature is how it simplifies the management of the SAN."
"The data reduction technology part of the scalability has been impressive, like its ability to host additional workloads, volumes of data, and databases."
"The solution is easily manageable."
"The initial setup is easy compared to other vendors."
"The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to process huge amounts of data."
"The storage features are valuable."
"We find the product to be very flexible."
"Over the eight years, we've been using NetApp with ONTAP, we've never lost a bit of data, and we've only experienced a few minutes of downtime in that entire time."
"The product can be scaled vertically as well as horizontally."
"You can easily scale up, and scale-out."
"The most valuable features are stability and performance."
"During the use cases of the solution, its reliability and suitability are the best."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a product that is fast and provides a fast I/O."
"They could improve the price."
"I had to contact customer support when a drive failed as I was doing a couple of OS upgrades."
"The technical support is okay, but could be improved."
"The primary drawback is the cost, which can be prohibitive for small configurations."
"If we suddenly dump large amounts of data onto the storage system, it takes a while to process it."
"The GUI could improve, it could be more intuitive. There is hidden functionality."
"Currently, the solution fails to support file screening."
"I would like to see some improvements on the FlashBlade side around the CIFS space support. I am not super familiar with all the different NAS protocols that they run on their box, but there could be some improvements made on SMB CIFS side."
"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."
"The product’s ability to recover information and generate reports needs enhancement."
"The support, visibility, and reporting features must be improved."
"The product’s UI could be better."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Sometimes, it takes a while to get somebody competent on the other end of the line. They do have engineers in multiple time zones around the world. However, their level-one support is not always the best."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"Stability is an area with a certain shortcoming where the solution needs to improve"
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It would be ideal if they could adjust it so that it's a but less."
"Increasing the RAM, and including physical cords would be beneficial."
"The support can take a few days to have a response. However, the response that we do receive is very informative."
HPE All-Flash Storage is ranked 10th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 3 reviews while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is ranked 7th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 10 reviews. HPE All-Flash Storage is rated 9.0, while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE All-Flash Storage writes "Easily manageable, expandable, and provides high-capacity and high security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 writes "Very easy to manage, highly stable and offers robustness of the CLI, API, and GUI ". HPE All-Flash Storage is most compared with , whereas NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series, Huawei OceanStor Dorado, NetApp ASA and NetApp AFF. See our HPE All-Flash Storage vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report.
See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.
We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.