Hitachi TrueCopy vs QoreStor comparison

Hitachi Vantara and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. Hitachi Vantara holds a 4.6% mindshare in DR, compared to Quest Software’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Hitachi TrueCopy

Read 1 Hitachi TrueCopy review

552 Views
552 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

1,790 Views
215 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi TrueCopy

QoreStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

QoreStor and Hitachi TrueCopy are both contenders in the data storage and replication market. Hitachi TrueCopy appears to have the advantage with its comprehensive feature set, making it a preferred choice over QoreStor which offers competitive pricing and support.

Features: QoreStor offers data deduplication, compression, and seamless integration with cloud platforms to enhance storage efficiency. Hitachi TrueCopy includes robust synchronous and asynchronous replication, ensuring data availability and integrity across distances. Both products offer comprehensive data management tools, but Hitachi TrueCopy's replication capabilities provide a distinct benefit for enterprises prioritizing consistent data availability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QoreStor's cloud-centric deployment simplifies installation and scaling, complemented by responsive customer service. Hitachi TrueCopy requires a more complex on-premises deployment involving a specialized setup, but offers extensive enterprise-grade support.

Pricing and ROI: QoreStor provides a competitive setup cost with efficient resource management, delivering solid ROI for mid-sized to large businesses. Hitachi TrueCopy, with its higher upfront cost, is valued as a worthy investment due to its extensive data replication features and long-term benefits for enterprises desiring high data assurance.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi TrueCopy

Ranking in Data Replication

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QoreStor

Ranking in Data Replication

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (53rd), Disk Based Backup Systems (8th), Storage Software (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (30th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (21st), Copy Data Management (6th), File and Object Storage (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Hitachi TrueCopy is 4.6%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QoreStor is 3.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hitachi TrueCopy	4.6%
QoreStor	3.1%
Other	92.3%

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Bratislav Petkovic

Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia

Offers useful replication tools with potential for faster support responses

In my opinion, the best features of Hitachi TrueCopy include its ability to act similarly to a snapshot from any disk, from any LUN, and for fast data copying from production to test. We use Hitachi TrueCopy and Thin Image. Hitachi TrueCopy allows us to transfer data from one storage to another, for example, when we buy new storage, we transfer data, LUNs, and disks from one storage to another, and we also use Hitachi TrueCopy to transfer data from one site to another site. We transfer data through iSCSI. The Hitachi TrueCopy ability to customize replication strategies is a very useful tool for replication.

Read full review

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hitachi TrueCopy is very effective for transferring big data from one storage to another storage."

"The best features of Hitachi TrueCopy include its ability to act similarly to a snapshot from any disk, from any LUN, and for fast copy data from production to test."

"This software solution can be installed on many different types of hardware, which makes it very flexible. We can run it on virtual machines or virtual servers, providing convenience for solutions of varying sizes, from small to large."

"The extreme compression of data is a big thing for us. We were looking for an online backup solution, and QoreStor is very good in terms of data compression. It helps us minimize the required storage in the Blob Storage environment."

"I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price."

"Quest QoreStor definitely saved us money."

"The dedupe and compression are pretty extreme. On disk, we're getting dedupe rates of up to 65 percent of data and compression of 34 percent. When you go to the cloud, it's more like 76 percent for dedupe and almost 50 percent for compression."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"The features we use for the data deduplication are nice because we're able to back up a much larger amount of data, yet it doesn't necessarily take up that much data on the devices."

More QoreStor pros

Cons

"Technical support is indeed an area for improvement; Hitachi has very good hardware and the equipment is good, but the support and management monitoring are not as robust as IMC, IBM, and HP."

"The installation could use improvement. The initial installation was a little touchy and it's not really user-installable. You have to have a connection to support to install."

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something. So that when we don't do a backup, we want the QoreStor to stay offline. It would be a nice feature to have."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing. I worked a lot with Quest engineers, especially in the early days when we were first testing it and trying it out. I actually had some of the developers working with us at one point because they were going through these point releases, and I was having trouble getting it to work in this S3-compatible situation. We got it all working eventually, but setup is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"The ransomware protection of QoreStor could use improvement."

"The importance of support is significant to me. I was working for a service provider, and all of our customers had a Quest or warning. Sometimes the support really underperforms."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

"There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

More QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hitachi TrueCopy?

Regarding improvements, I think Hitachi TrueCopy is very effective for transferring big data from one storage to another. For transferring data on the same storage, we use Thin Image and Shadow Ima...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hitachi TrueCopy?

It is actually a SAN switch, not Brocade Ethernet switches. A switch with the Fibre Channel ports connects storage to Brocade, and for network, we use Cisco switches, but for SAN, we use Brocade. I...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hitachi TrueCopy?

We deploy Hitachi TrueCopy on-premises, with one instance in our head office, and the second on disaster recovery, but it works for our on-premises needs. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Hitachi T...

See all answers

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

Comparisons

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs Hitachi TrueCopy

Compared 35% of the time

Hitachi ShadowImage vs Hitachi TrueCopy

Compared 32% of the time

NetApp SnapMirror vs Hitachi TrueCopy

Compared 18% of the time

Global-active device vs Hitachi TrueCopy

Compared 15% of the time

More Hitachi TrueCopy Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 26% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs QoreStor

Compared 18% of the time

Dell Avamar vs QoreStor

Compared 16% of the time

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs QoreStor

Compared 15% of the time

Fivetran vs QoreStor

Compared 13% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

January 2026

Download Hitachi TrueCopy product report

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

December 2025

Download QoreStor product report

Also Known As

No data available

QoreStor

Overview

For everyday uptime and rapid recovery demands in the event of an outage, choose Hitachi TrueCopy remote replication software. TrueCopy synchronously mirrors data between Hitachi storage systems across metropolitan distances.

Hitachi Vantara

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.