Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is HAProxy?

Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured HAProxy reviews

HAProxy mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of HAProxy in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 11.9%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HAProxy11.9%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)15.7%
NetScaler14.4%
Other58.0%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on HAProxy reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Aug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs NetScalerAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Aug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application GatewayAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.77.6%79%48 interviewsAdd to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.115.7%83%122 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business317
Midsize Enterprise225
Large Enterprise642
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare HAProxy with alternative products

Learn more about HAProxy

HAProxy customers

Related questions

 
HAProxy Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager - IT Infrastructure and Network at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I use HAProxy for load balancing and find it effective but challenging to implement and troubleshoot. The dashboards and reports need improvement to compete better with F5, HAProxy's main competitor in the market.
Co-Founder at tenekit4.0I use HAProxy primarily for quick, small load-balancing tasks, appreciating its simplicity and speed. It's straightforward to configure, integrates well with Docker, and efficiently manages basic tasks, though enhanced documentation with diverse scenarios would improve its usability.
Manager server admin and security at Vivaconnect3.5In my company, I use HAProxy for TCP streams, specifically handling SMTP, SMPP, and POP3 services. While effective for traffic forwarding, it lacks robust logging and monitoring. HAProxy is cost-effective compared to high-end alternatives like DNS Made Easy.
UCaaS Engineering Manager at EarthLink4.0No summary available
Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS4.0No summary available
System Administrator at Styria IT4.5I use HAProxy for load balancing HTTP and TCP traffic across application and database servers, ensuring resource efficiency. While HAProxy is versatile and easy to integrate, its dynamic configuration needs improvement as reloading loses changes. NGINX, though simpler to configure, serves different purposes.
Développeur applications at Trust Merchant Bank4.5We use HAProxy as a load balancer for our application servers, including Bonita and Telus solutions. Although we are still exploring its features, it seems to offer extensive capabilities. However, the pricing model could be more affordable.
Manager - IT Infrastructure and Network at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5No summary available