Graylog Enterprise vs Mezmo comparison

Graylog and Mezmo are both solutions in the Log Management category. Graylog is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.4, while Mezmo is ranked #55. Graylog holds a 5.0% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Mezmo’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Graylog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Graylog Enterprise

Read 22 Graylog Enterprise reviews

7,823 Views
7,823 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

974 Views
575 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Graylog Enterprise and Mezmo are competitors in log management and analysis. Mezmo is perceived as superior in feature richness and perceived value, while Graylog Enterprise focuses on cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Graylog Enterprise is known for robust search, analysis capabilities, and extensive integration. Mezmo is recognized for intuitive analytics, real-time insights, and advanced analytics features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Graylog Enterprise provides a flexible deployment model and competitive customer service. Mezmo offers a seamless deployment process with proactive customer support and quicker setup. Graylog's deployment is customizable, while Mezmo's simplicity and efficiency appeal to those seeking swift implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Graylog Enterprise offers a cost-effective setup with favorable long-term ROI and balanced feature-to-price ratio. Mezmo has a higher initial cost yet justifies it with advanced analytics and faster operational impact, resulting in commendable ROI. Mezmo's pricing is aligned with its robust feature set, appealing to businesses seeking immediate insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (75th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 5.0%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Graylog Enterprise	5.0%
Mezmo	0.5%
Other	94.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2704128

Head of Cyber Security & CTO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Robust event correlation enhances operations, yet integration scope can broaden for seamless data handling

The features and capabilities of Graylog that we have found most valuable are related to its basis on open search, which was ElasticSearch. We appreciate being able to integrate custom feeds and do custom parsers, and to be able to do some of the correlation on it. That all works effectively. The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm. We use it for investigating problems and problem management. We throw all the information at it, we have it alerting for certain conditions, but generally we use it for deep diving into issues as needed.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."

"It has data adapters and lookup tables that utilize HTTP calls to APIs."

"The product is scalable. The solution is stable."

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

"Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its new interface."

"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."

"The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

Cons

"More customization is always useful."

"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."

"Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution."

"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second."

"Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved."

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

"The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture."

"More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"We're using the Community edition."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Government

Transportation Company

26%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 25% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 21% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 29% of the time

New Relic vs Mezmo

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Mezmo

Compared 13% of the time

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Mezmo

Compared 11% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

December 2025

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Cribl vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

Graylog2

LogDNA

Overview

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo

December 2025

Free Report: Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Graylog Enterprise vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.