Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Infraon IMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Grafana Labs Logo
262 views|195 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
EverestIMS Logo
529 views|257 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Grafana Enterprise Stack and Infraon IMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables.""The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues.""The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Pros →

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem.""The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good.""The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization.""The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications.""Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day.""Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support.""We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm.""It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

More Infraon IMS Pros →

Cons
"The tool needs to show only fewer updates.""I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana.""The solution should include integration with Power BI."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Cons →

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D.""The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use.""Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time.""There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product.""We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices.""The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved.""I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution.""This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

More Infraon IMS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
  • "The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
  • "The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
  • "If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
  • "Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
  • "I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
  • More Infraon IMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance… more »
    Top Answer:The tool needs to show only fewer updates.
    Top Answer:I use Grafana Enterprise Stack primarily to monitor the metrics of Selenoid, focusing on checking the CPU, iOS, network, and additional metrics. I create dashboards to check the status of these… more »
    Top Answer:It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective.  You can check… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    262
    Comparisons
    195
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    290
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    529
    Comparisons
    257
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Everest IMS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications. 

    Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

    Powered by AI, Infraon IMS offers you a platform that provides precision monitoring, detailed insight and rapid troubleshooting for heterogeneous IT Infrastructure across enterprises of all sizes. Gaining real time reports and alerts on application and network performance on a single platform enables teams to collaboratively troubleshoot performance issues and proactively ensure top-notch service quality.

    Sample Customers
    1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell
    Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Infraon IMS
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Grafana Enterprise Stack is ranked 55th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 3 reviews while Infraon IMS is ranked 64th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Grafana Enterprise Stack is rated 7.6, while Infraon IMS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Grafana Enterprise Stack writes "Offers simplicity and effectiveness in handling our monitoring needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infraon IMS writes "Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization". Grafana Enterprise Stack is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, OpsRamp, Dell CloudIQ and EV Observe, whereas Infraon IMS is most compared with Zabbix and Microsoft Configuration Manager. See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Infraon IMS report.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.