Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Huawei eSight comparison

Grafana Labs and Huawei are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Huawei is ranked #35 with an average rating of 9.0. Grafana Labs holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Huawei’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 72% of Huawei users who would recommend it.

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 13 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

1,190 Views
1,166 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Huawei eSight

Read 10 Huawei eSight reviews

1,965 Views
1,061 Comparison Views

72% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Huawei eSight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Huawei eSight and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in IT monitoring and management. Grafana Enterprise Stack appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features, justifying its higher cost, whereas Huawei eSight stands out in pricing and support.

Features: Huawei eSight focuses on network management with comprehensive visualization, automation capabilities, and infrastructural oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack is known for flexible data visualizations, integration with various data sources, and customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Huawei eSight could enhance integration flexibility, expand data source compatibility, and improve dashboard customization. Grafana Enterprise Stack might work on improving its pricing structure, enhance support for network management functions, and streamline more features for infrastructural oversight.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei eSight offers a user-friendly deployment with strong support, suitable for organizations needing steady assistance. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with a broad support ecosystem, ideal for those prioritizing quick setup and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei eSight is cost-effective, yielding substantial ROI for users needing affordable network oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack requires a higher investment but delivers high ROI with its advanced analytics, justifying costs for data-driven organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huawei eSight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei eSight is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	1.2%
Huawei eSight	0.9%
Other	97.9%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Gregory Diana

Managing Director at Exponential Energy (Pty) Ltd

Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points

In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.

Read full review

Gary Strydom

Desktop Analyst at Transnet

Used to monitor devices and provides the hardware alarms feature

Huawei eSight has helped me overcome many monitoring aspects of the hardware. From a single view, I can monitor all the hardware. Instead of logging on to each piece of hardware and monitoring it individually, I can monitor them from one single point. I would recommend the solution to other users because it provides a single point of view of the hardware. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"We can scale the solution."

"Huawei eSight provides businesses with monitoring capabilities of network devices across your network."

"The solution's most valuable dashboard features include monitoring storage, resource availability, and hardware alarms."

"eSight allows me to monitor and solve any problem in the backbone and any switch in real-time."

"The most important features are alarm management and the visualization of the health of our network devices."

"I like that it supports all our Huawei devices. Unlike other network monitoring tools that monitor Huawei devices, it provides more details when it comes to monitoring or management. We can get complete details about the devices, and management is also simple."

"The product is stable."

"I like the real-time location monitor or RTLS feature. It is similar to the monitoring feature in Cisco Prime."

More Huawei eSight pros

Cons

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"The price could be less costly."

"The solution needs to improve it's user interface to make it more modern and stylish. They need to design proper menu positions, features, etc. Right now the layout is complicated."

"Something that could be improved is the lack of integration with Cisco switches. In the next release, I would like to see better reporting."

"eSight has many features and options, but sometimes, we feel that it should be more advanced, like Cisco. It would be good if they can enable some automation part in eSight. Most of our customers want automation in their network. They don't want a dependency on everything. That's why the automation part must be improved in Huawei. It will be beneficial for customers. Cisco has different products, and there are multiple products for monitoring, automation, etc. In the software-defined network, Cisco has ACI, and VMware has NSX. Such options must be there in Huawei to move to a software-defined network. Unlike Cisco, in the case of eSight, there is only one product. I am not aware of any other product. It would be good to enhance it with at least some automation options so that we can use it effectively in the campus network or big data center environment. When I implemented this Huawei solution, I faced some limitations in particular areas like wireless scanning. This is another part that they can improve. Wireless reporting option is not as effective as other monitoring solutions. For a particular use case, if a customer is asking for some reports, sometimes they are not 100% satisfactory. The reporting structure must be improved."

"The variety of license types should be made simpler as, at present, it is complex."

"It will be better if they can make the simple network topology part more presentable. It would also be better if they had API integration and integration with third-party devices."

"This solution could be improved by offering monitoring for all devices and not only Huawei devices."

"Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange."

More Huawei eSight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing for Huawei eSight is reasonable, especially with the base license and incremental licenses for additional devices. However, the variety of license types can be a bit complex. We used to sell eSight but switched to another solution, so we're not actively trading it anymore."

"The price is very expensive."

"Pricing depends on the competition. If your competitor is like Cisco, then Huawei is much more competitive when it comes to pricing."

"Its pricing is better than any other Huawei product. Some products are cheaper in Huawei, and some products are cheaper in Cisco. Cisco has more benefits and options than Huawei if you consider different network environments."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing. The pricing depends on which features you use and can become expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The layout is good, but I think it needs some enhancement based on my experience. I might not have gotten deeper to understand more details, but I believe it needs more improvement. Scalability and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have been working for several months with Icinga, but after that, I moved forward to Zabbix, and now I might switch to Grafana Enterprise Stack. I am trying many alternatives to provide monitorin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huawei eSight?

Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huawei eSight?

We use the solution to monitor the hardware environment of our data center. We mainly use Huawei eSight to monitor the devices. It assists in monitoring our devices in terms of utilization and moni...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Huawei eSight?

See all answers

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 15% of the time

LiveAction LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 12% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 11% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 10% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Cisco DNA Center vs Huawei eSight

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs Huawei eSight

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Huawei eSight

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Huawei eSight

Compared 7% of the time

H3C intelligent Management Center vs Huawei eSight

Compared 7% of the time

More Huawei eSight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

September 2025

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

October 2025

Download Huawei eSight product report

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Huawei's eSight is a unified software suite for planning, operating, and maintaining complex enterprise ICT infrastructure from global, converged networks and data centers to multimedia and video communications that includes the facilities necessary for delivering performance and IT services. eSight provides a platform that supports infrastructure and devices from third-party providers, to develop custom management applications and improves O&M efficiency.

Huawei

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Marina Bay, CITIC Pacific Mining

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

September 2025

Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.