Google Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Google and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Virtuozzo is ranked #22. Google holds a 5.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud

Read 81 Google Cloud reviews

15,948 Views
7,655 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

1,565 Views
1,330 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Virtuozzo Application Platform and Google Cloud are cloud platform options with different strengths. Google Cloud may have the upper hand due to its advanced features that cater to those needing extensive functionality.

Features: Virtuozzo Application Platform stands out with integrated container management, simplified orchestration capabilities, and competitive pricing. Google Cloud offers a comprehensive suite, including AI and machine learning tools, vast global infrastructure, and extensive scalability options.

Room for Improvement: Virtuozzo could improve by expanding its feature set, enhancing scalability options, and increasing market presence. Google Cloud might work on simplifying its deployment process, lowering its initial cost for smaller businesses, and enhancing its customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Virtuozzo Application Platform provides a streamlined deployment experience with intuitive tools and positive customer support feedback. Google Cloud's deployment process is more complex but is supported by robust documentation and a wide range of learning resources.

Pricing and ROI: Virtuozzo offers lower setup costs and a pricing structure yielding favorable ROI for small to mid-sized companies. In contrast, Google Cloud's higher initial investment is justified by its scalability and feature-rich environment, benefiting larger enterprises seeking long-term growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.8%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	1.7%
Other	92.5%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It eliminates capital expenditures and subsequent MNO that we would use to spend on on-prem architectures. That money is funneled towards security and connectivity provisioning."

"The performance is a valuable feature."

"The solution works well for BigQuery and big data analysis support such as column alerts and tabular databases."

"Google Cloud offerings have a number of features which complement each other to provide very solid cloud feature sets."

"It's a perfect tool for startups."

"People see the ease, simplicity, and again the Ubiquiti of the service attached to it."

"Google Cloud's most valuable features are its performance and ease of access."

"Because it's a cloud-based solution, we are always using the latest version."

More Google Cloud pros

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"We almost don't have to maintain our servers."

"The technical support is extremely helpful, and they have a very good support team."

"If you are looking for a great PaaS product, don't hesitate to check Jelastic!"

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

More Virtuozzo Application Platform pros

Cons

"Another issue is the applicability of local language data capturing mechanisms, which are more advanced on cloud service providers, but still there is room to grow. Also, their hybrid version isn't available in all markets worldwide, so I'm hoping that it will be released globally soon"

"In terms of Google services, providing more hypervisors would be beneficial."

"The product must provide AI features."

"The support is bad, and you have to purchase it separately."

"The price of the license could be cheaper."

"They could always offer even more storage at the base level."

"There is currently no intuitive way to filter logs on the Google console, especially for individuals who are not familiar with query languages."

"The solution has okay stability, however, that said, it has a way to go before it keeps up to something like Azure."

More Google Cloud cons

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"An S3 like storage system, if they have a s3 API compatible system I can move my files from AWS."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better integration into enterprise storage products."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be better."

"Google Cloud is quite expensive, and I rate it at seven out of ten."

"Google cloud is less expensive than other comparable solutions."

"The cost might be $10 a month per user, which is about $300 a month in total."

"We pay for a license."

"Google Cloud could be cheaper."

"For commercial purposes, users need to pay for the products they use on a workload basis, not a license basis. There are two pricing models: fixed monthly and pay-as-you-go. In the pay-as-you-go model, users pay for the resources they use, while in the fixed monthly model, they have 24/7 access to resources for a set monthly fee."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	38

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

August 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

August 2026

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

GCP

Jelastic

Overview

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

Virtuozzo Application Platform offers a comprehensive PaaS solution enabling dynamic auto-scaling and efficient resource management, focusing on code stability and ease of use.

Virtuozzo Application Platform provides horizontal and vertical scaling without requiring code changes, ensuring developers can prioritize code optimization. It features advanced Docker hosting and convenient one-click deployments. With a flexible pricing model, it's designed for straightforward, controlled usage with a focus on scalability and manageability.

What are Virtuozzo Application Platform's important features?

Auto-Scaling: Enables horizontal and vertical scaling without altering code.
Docker Hosting: Supports advanced Docker environments.
One-Click Deployment: Simplifies the application deployment process.
Billing Model: Offers usage-based billing for cost efficiency.
Dynamic Vertical Scaling: Provides granular resource assignment.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Scalability: Easily scales to meet demand without additional code changes.
Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with pay-per-use.
User-Friendly: Ensures easy setup with no steep learning curve.

Organizations leverage Virtuozzo Application Platform for PaaS reselling and management, hosting it on public clouds for flexibility. It's favored by managed service providers for supporting environments ranging from static applications to governmental projects. Those involved include management, system engineers, and developers, who appreciate its fault tolerance and high availability in deployment scenarios.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

August 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.