Google Cloud vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Google and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Virtuozzo is ranked #22. Google holds a 5.1% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud

Read 80 Google Cloud reviews

10,424 Views
5,212 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

1,164 Views
966 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Virtuozzo Application Platform and Google Cloud are cloud platform options with different strengths. Google Cloud may have the upper hand due to its advanced features that cater to those needing extensive functionality.

Features: Virtuozzo Application Platform stands out with integrated container management, simplified orchestration capabilities, and competitive pricing. Google Cloud offers a comprehensive suite, including AI and machine learning tools, vast global infrastructure, and extensive scalability options.

Room for Improvement: Virtuozzo could improve by expanding its feature set, enhancing scalability options, and increasing market presence. Google Cloud might work on simplifying its deployment process, lowering its initial cost for smaller businesses, and enhancing its customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Virtuozzo Application Platform provides a streamlined deployment experience with intuitive tools and positive customer support feedback. Google Cloud's deployment process is more complex but is supported by robust documentation and a wide range of learning resources.

Pricing and ROI: Virtuozzo offers lower setup costs and a pricing structure yielding favorable ROI for small to mid-sized companies. In contrast, Google Cloud's higher initial investment is justified by its scalability and feature-rich environment, benefiting larger enterprises seeking long-term growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.1%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.1%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	1.7%
Other	93.2%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its flexibility."

"Google Cloud can be used to share files with no need to carry them with you since it is on the cloud, and you can access it anywhere if you are traveling or if you have important documents."

"Google Cloud is user friendly and reliable. The most valuable feature is the security of Google Cloud."

"We have had a great experience with customer service and support, and they provide excellent service."

"The solution works well for BigQuery and big data analysis support such as column alerts and tabular databases."

"We can share documents with the whole class. Sharing information Using Google Drive and Google Cloud is very common."

"This is a solution that's so easy to expand when you need it to. It's the best I've ever seen. It's much better than Azure."

"The solution can scale as well."

More Google Cloud pros

"As a strategic solution, it's really good because it will avoid a lot of cost if you are building your data center, for example, or from scratch."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"Jelastic is exactly what we expect from a PaaS vendor: easy-to-start, easy-to-manage, container based technology, support for vertical and horizontal auto-scaling, and all this without vendor lock-in."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"If you are looking for a great PaaS product, don't hesitate to check Jelastic!"

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"The technical support is extremely helpful, and they have a very good support team."

More Virtuozzo Application Platform pros

Cons

"The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available."

"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones."

"My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies which means means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

"The price could improve. Every customer would agree, that they would like the price to be reduced."

"It could have a reporting tool included."

"Google Cloud should provide more introductory videos on how to get started. Currently, very few of these resources are available. Additionally, training on Google Cloud products is not very well streamlined. Users have to search for training, which can be quite complex."

"I would like to see Google Cloud become more competitive when it comes to price."

"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved."

More Google Cloud cons

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

"I would like to see better integration into enterprise storage products."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

More Virtuozzo Application Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Google Cloud is affordable compared to others services. I pay monthly for the service."

"This solution is worth the money we are paying. I would rate the pricing a three out of five."

"Google offers a free account with minimal data backup and we can subscribe for more data."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"It's not really an expensive solution, but it would be better if there were more flexibility in the pricing model."

"Google Cloud is on the expensive side for us. I don't have exact figures on the cost per year or month."

"The solution is cheaper than Azure."

"The service is cheap and I give it a seven out of ten for the cost."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Outsourcing Company

12%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	37

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

Better discounting and discount offers, especially for long-running servers, would be a very good option. A localized cloud in the MENA region would also be very important for us because we are ope...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

We are using Google Cloud Kubernetes service. We are using Cloud Build. We are using the PostgreSQL managed service. We are hosting our software platform on Google Cloud. We are using Kubernetes to...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

I'm not working with Honeycomb. Google Cloud is a cloud provider and it's still a strong option to choose. However, I would personally prefer AWS. My overall rating for Google Cloud is seven out of...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

May 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

April 2026

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

GCP

Jelastic

Overview

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

Virtuozzo Application Platform offers a comprehensive PaaS solution enabling dynamic auto-scaling and efficient resource management, focusing on code stability and ease of use.

Virtuozzo Application Platform provides horizontal and vertical scaling without requiring code changes, ensuring developers can prioritize code optimization. It features advanced Docker hosting and convenient one-click deployments. With a flexible pricing model, it's designed for straightforward, controlled usage with a focus on scalability and manageability.

What are Virtuozzo Application Platform's important features?

Auto-Scaling: Enables horizontal and vertical scaling without altering code.
Docker Hosting: Supports advanced Docker environments.
One-Click Deployment: Simplifies the application deployment process.
Billing Model: Offers usage-based billing for cost efficiency.
Dynamic Vertical Scaling: Provides granular resource assignment.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Scalability: Easily scales to meet demand without additional code changes.
Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with pay-per-use.
User-Friendly: Ensures easy setup with no steep learning curve.

Organizations leverage Virtuozzo Application Platform for PaaS reselling and management, hosting it on public clouds for flexibility. It's favored by managed service providers for supporting environments ranging from static applications to governmental projects. Those involved include management, system engineers, and developers, who appreciate its fault tolerance and high availability in deployment scenarios.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

April 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.