Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform compete in the security and cloud management category. Based on the comparison, ThreatLocker has the upper hand due to its straightforward deployment, effective zero-trust strategies, and proactive customer service, outweighing its integration improvements.
Features: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is noted for its efficient resource utilization, flexibility, scalability, and advanced integration with Kubernetes, BigQuery, and CI/CD pipelines. ThreatLocker excels in robust security measures through zero-trust frameworks, application control, and ring-fencing strategies, enhancing security with effective software management and blocking capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy faces usability challenges in document management and support for non-premium users, as well as system integration, stability, and pricing issues. Enhancements in user-friendliness and detailed documentation are needed. ThreatLocker could improve integration with PSA systems, reporting capabilities, and control over software updates while addressing network saturation and providing flexible training.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is primarily deployed in public cloud environments with online resources and responsive support but has inconsistencies in multi-layered support responses. ThreatLocker allows flexible deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds with proactive customer service and Cyber Hero support, though 24-hour availability and nuanced support handling are suggested improvements.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is seen as expensive, yet it offers significant ROI due to its comprehensive features, though its cost-effectiveness is debated. ThreatLocker offers fair and transparent pricing, providing considerable value despite challenges with pricing adjustments and contract renewals, offering flexible and scalable pricing for diverse organizational needs.
Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Since our founding in 1998, Google has grown by leaps and bounds. From offering search in a single language we now offer dozens of products and services—including various forms of advertising and web applications for all kinds of tasks—in scores of languages. And starting from two computer science students in a university dorm room, we now have thousands of employees and offices around the world. A lot has changed since the first Google search engine appeared. But some things haven’t changed: our dedication to our users and our belief in the possibilities of the Internet itself.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
