Google Cloud Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 10.5% mindshare in IAMS, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity

Read 25 Google Cloud Identity reviews

4,109 Views
3,082 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 7 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

1,570 Views
659 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Google Cloud Identity and IBM Security Verify Access are identity and access management solutions. IBM Security Verify Access tends to have an advantage due to its extensive features in security and compliance for enterprises.

Features: Google Cloud Identity provides seamless integration with Google services, robust authentication methods, and multi-factor authentication. IBM Security Verify Access offers fine-grained access control, advanced policy management, and a variety of authentication methods including tokens and one-time passwords.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Identity could improve depth in security features and enhance compatibility with non-Google systems. It also lacks some advanced policy management options. IBM Security Verify Access might streamline its complex deployment process, improve cost efficiency, and enhance the user interface for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Identity offers quick and straightforward deployment, especially for existing Google users. IBM Security Verify Access requires a more complex setup but provides comprehensive customer support crucial for intricate security environments.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Identity is viewed as cost-effective with lower setup costs and integration benefits, leading to a strong ROI with moderate investment. Conversely, IBM Security Verify Access, despite higher upfront costs, provides valuable long-term ROI due to its extensive feature set supporting sophisticated security frameworks.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (11th)

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity Management (IM) (25th), Access Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity is 10.5%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Joel Prodigalidad

Central and Enduser Computing Manager at Infopro Business Solutions, Inc.

User-friendly solution simplifies modern application integration and streamlines data investigation

We do not use these capabilities of Google Cloud Identity because of the limitations for Active Directory integration. Google Cloud Identity could have impacted our organization positively, but if it weren't for the Active Directory integration requirement, we could have been using the Google Identity solution. Google Cloud Identity can be improved by having better integration with Active Directory, but since Active Directory is also a Microsoft solution, we don't think it will happen; that's the only disadvantage of Google. The Active Directory integration that Entra has is a better implementation compared to Google, which we found lacking.

Read full review

Jared Ochieng

Information Technology Security Specialist at infoark

Offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords

The authentication process with IBM Security Verify Access is good and is considered one of the best identity and access management solutions. It helps with multi-factor authentication. It offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords, enhancing security. It also includes features like password vaults and single sign-on, streamlining the access process for remote and local users across different solutions. The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options. The policy control feature allows you to set authentication measures and policies for your organization's identity governance. This feature helps create standardized policies and organize them into groups based on departments or specific needs. It simplifies access management for both administrators and users. IBM Security Verify Access can be integrated with almost any solution using APIs. The time required for integration depends on whether the solution is out of the box or custom. Out-of-the-box solutions can be integrated quickly, typically within a few days or hours, while custom solutions may require additional steps and take longer to integrate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"The Cloud Identity is well advanced in terms of features, applications, and the components that it is offering."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

"The initial setup is easy."

"I think the first thing that is great is that it gives you a lot of features, like login, and then vaulted passwords and secure LDAP. It becomes easier for the end customer to leverage all those features without going to a higher SKU of G Suite."

"The most valuable feature is that you can manage users from one central location."

"The solution is primarily used for single control and single sign which helps with the security and authentication of multiple devices."

"The tool provides a free service that you can integrate for laptop authentication. You also don’t need a separate Active Directory."

More Google Cloud Identity pros

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

Cons

"The one place it could be improved is the password vaulting. The password vaulting does not prevent the admins from reading users' passwords, and that's a debate."

"To improve the product, the integration with third-party products could always be smoother."

"The management of external users needs to be introduced in the tool as it is an area of concern in the tool presently."

"There is room for improvement in the configuration of their security policies. It seems quite basic."

"The solution needs to better integrate with Mac's OS."

"Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing."

"The integration should be made easier."

"I would like to see more integration in future releases."

More Google Cloud Identity cons

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost depends on the partners and the relationship between the company and the partners."

"We probably spend about $50,000 a year on licensing."

"When I worked on Cloud Identity, they offered a free or enterprise version. You can synchronize and create up to 100 user identities in the free version. After that, you have to purchase a business or enterprise license. In that model, you'll be charged based on the number of users."

"The product is billed on a monthly basis depending on the number of users."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The fees are paid monthly and there are no additional costs other than the licensing fees."

More Google Cloud Identity pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Identity?

The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is its stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity?

It's crucial to monitor costs carefully, as there can be unexpected charges. I have been charged even when there was supposed to be free credit.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 67% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

JumpCloud vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity Competitors

Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 12% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity

August 2025

Download Google Cloud Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

July 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

Cloud Identity, Cloud Identity Premium

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

Cloud Identity is an Identity as a Service (IDaaS) and enterprise mobility management (EMM) product. It offers the identity services and endpoint administration that are available in G Suite as a stand-alone product. As an administrator, you can use Cloud Identity to manage your users, apps, and devices from a central location - the Google Admin console.

Google

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Sample Customers

ExtraHop Networks, HealthChannels

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

July 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.