You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Google and RSA are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. Google is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while RSA is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 0.6% mindshare in IAM, compared to RSA’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity and A...

Read 2 Google Cloud Identity and Access Management reviews

317 Views
307 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

1,016 Views
732 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity and A...

RSA Identity Governance and...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Identity and Access Management and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity and A...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

19th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity and Access Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud Identity and Access Management	0.6%
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.2%
Other	98.2%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Narendar Bompally

Hybrid Cloud Engineer at RealPage

Seamless integration with cloud identity enhances access management and simplifies task management

The most valuable features in Google Cloud Identity and Access Management include Smart Access control, which automatically detects permissions, and rightsizing. Cloud Identity facilitates access to Google Cloud, and the governance policies are good. I also find the programmatic command line features, such as the G Cloud command-line tool, valuable as it simplifies tasks and makes them easy to manage.

Read full review

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I rate the solution at ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features in Google Cloud Identity and Access Management include Smart Access control, which automatically detects permissions, and rightsizing."

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

"Never - one thing I can say about RSA is that the boxes are stable and solid."

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"It improved security."

"Soft and hard tokens for two factor authentication has been introduced."

"All of the features in this product are good and this is a product that I recommend."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle pros

Cons

"I find Google Cloud Identity and Access Management's pricing to be on the expensive side"

"I find Google Cloud Identity and Access Management's pricing to be on the expensive side, rating it as seven out of ten. However, if the price could be made cheaper as more clients are included, it would be beneficial."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring."

"The stability of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve; it has some bugs that need to be fixed."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

"Application and appliance stability needs improvement."

"We were excited that the self-provision feature was now built into the box but disappointed at the implementation."

"It could be a little more flexible with the installation of the product."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity and Access Management?

I find Google Cloud Identity and Access Management's pricing to be on the expensive side, rating it as seven out of ten. However, if the price could be made cheaper as more clients are included, it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Identity and Access Management?

As of now, I did not find anything that needs improvement. Google's solution started four years ago, and I've only been working more comprehensively with it for two years. It's not bad, it is actua...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Identity and Access Management?

We have a tool called CyberArk. From CyberArk, I take the link and open it from this solution. It links to AD, the domain controller, enabling us to connect to Google Cloud Platform.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity and Access Management

Compared 15% of the time

JumpCloud vs Google Cloud Identity and Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Google Cloud Identity and Access Management

Compared 11% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs Google Cloud Identity and Access Management

Compared 10% of the time

Omada Identity vs Google Cloud Identity and Access Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity and Access Management Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 38% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 13% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 7% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

February 2026

Google Cloud Identity and Access Management report

Download Google Cloud Identity and Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

March 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Also Known As

No data available

SecurID

Overview

Google Cloud Identity and Access Management enables secure management of user access to cloud resources for various use cases like controlling access to G Suite applications and enforcing multi-factor authentication. Valuable features include ease of use, robust security measures, and seamless integration with other Google services. It improves workflow efficiency and productivity within organizations.

Google

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian2. Cisco3. Coca-Cola4. Dell5. Equinix6. GE7. Google8. IBM9. Intel10. JPMorgan Chase11. LinkedIn12. Microsoft13. Netflix14. Oracle15. PayPal16. SAP17. Siemens18. Spotify19. Tesla20. Toyota21. Twitter22. Visa23. Walt Disney24. WeWork25. World Bank26. Xerox27. Zynga

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

March 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.