We performed a comparison between GoodAccess and Intercept X Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."GoodAccess is allowing us to give first-hand support and access to critical client systems, in a secure way."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the static IP and speed."
"GoodAccess was the only hosted VPN solution we found for a reasonable cost that allowed us to establish a site-to-site VPN network for hundreds of locations across the country."
"It has become an integral part of our remote work toolkit, as it enables us to overcome USA IP restrictions, ensuring our global teams can collaborate effectively."
"GoodAccess VPN has brought a transformative shift to our organization, notably enhancing collaboration and enabling seamless remote work."
"GoodAccess has significantly improved security in our organization."
"Access control allows us to manage permissions efficiently, ensuring secure and tailored access."
"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."
"The performance is good."
"Malware protection and application blocking are absolutely great. The DLP and malware features are very helpful. It is also very user-friendly, reliable, and scalable. It is easy to set up. We are also happy with its price and support."
"Very stable solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"Sophos Intercept X is a complete endpoint solution."
"The forensics within the solution are quite good. The ransomware mitigation is also impressive."
"The package we use also comes with spam filtering features, which are quite useful."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Enhancing the user interface and experience could make it more intuitive for all users."
"This past year, I did not like having to purchase an upgrade to a plan with a minimum number of seats to get the features we needed. We do not use all of the seats."
"The logs do not go back very far."
"The price tier is not suited for small teams."
"The interface could provide more extensive information regarding the occurrence of threats. Currently, it only displays rudimentary threat data."
"Adding one user at a time to the package as compared to blocks of five would be helpful. Currently, we end up with empty seats on our plans."
"There is one minor drawback to mention: occasionally, the Internet connection tends to slow down noticeably while using the VPN."
"Their recent revision in pricing was a jolt. Though any business understands the need for periodic pricing evaluations, a clearer communication strategy and more gradual changes might have been more palatable for long-term clients like us."
"The performance is very slow and should be faster."
"The number one thing I would like is if their support could be a little faster and it would be a little easier to get a hold of support when you need them."
"When I use a proxy, I can bypass Sophos, which is an area that needs improvement."
"To be a perfect product, the price would have to be a bit better."
"The deployment part needs to be improved."
"Through Sophos Central I would like to see the ability to zero in and produce a report about the challenges being faced by a particular machine and user, to know if a virus is appearing only on that specific machine or also on others."
"Deployment on cloud needs to be carried out manually."
"In terms of the site-to-site VPN elements, they tend to concentrate. It's quite simple when there are Meraki devices at both ends of the VPN but if there is another user at one end, on another device, it can be a bit tricky. So they could really simplify that process a bit."
GoodAccess is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 19 reviews while Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 8th in ZTNA with 101 reviews. GoodAccess is rated 9.2, while Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GoodAccess writes "Robust, allows for remote work, and has comprehensive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". GoodAccess is most compared with , whereas Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiClient. See our GoodAccess vs. Intercept X Endpoint report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.