GoCD vs OpenText Software Delivery Management comparison

Thoughtworks and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Thoughtworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.3, while OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Thoughtworks holds a 0.2% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Thoughtworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

144 Views
95 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,963 Views
2,200 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GoCD

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

GoCD and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in the software delivery management sector. OpenText Software Delivery Management has the upper hand in terms of offering a more robust and integrated solution, while GoCD is favored for its transparent pricing and efficient support.

Features: GoCD offers advanced pipeline modeling, integrations with cloud providers, and a user-friendly interface. OpenText Software Delivery Management provides comprehensive lifecycle management, advanced analytics, and reporting capabilities, addressing complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could benefit from expanding its plugin offerings, enhancing LDAP integration features, and improving documentation. OpenText Software Delivery Management may work on simplifying its deployment process, reducing its initial cost, and upgrading the reporting interface for more seamless use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD excels in straightforward deployment and community support, making setup simple. OpenText Software Delivery Management, while more complex to deploy, offers extensive customer support and training options, aiding users through its rich feature set.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD is known for its transparent pricing and lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with a rapid ROI. OpenText Software Delivery Management, despite higher initial expenses, delivers significant returns for enterprises utilizing its full capabilities, balancing cost with comprehensive value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoCD

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (17th), Release Automation (11th)

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of GoCD is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 6.0%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at Cognizant

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization."

"The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features."

"The integration capability of ALM Octane was very straightforward. We had a supporting team, and they provided us with detailed documentation."

"The filtering options are very good once you learn them. The document reports are also valuable. You can create reports in Word and PDF formats. That's very useful."

"The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack."

"The integration points are very good. Octane gives us a window not only into our manual testing, but also our automation testing and our performance testing. We can see all results from all three streams of testing in one place."

"The most useful feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the dashboards, they are easy to use."

"It’s easy to set up."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

Cons

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"Because JIRA is a leading tool for both development and requirements management - everybody is using JIRA - I'm pretty there will be a use case where people are trying to connect between ALM Octane and JIRA. The back-end configuration of the synchronization with JIRA could be simplified. The architecture is really complicated. We required a lot of machines to build the cluster and the configuration was not really clearly described within the documentation. This may have something to do with the fact that the software is pretty new."

"What could be improved in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its integration with Jira."

"Currently, Micro Focus ALM Octane is considered an old-world tool in the industry and lacks the perception of being a new-age tool among its customers."

"Development of extensions or connections to GitHub actions could be better. Better integration with Azure DevOps would also help."

"Promoting it more could help a lot of projects."

"I like their smart analytics; perhaps they should continue to expand and improve there because it's a fantastic start."

"Documentation is not clear."

"There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"It will be as expensive as ALM.NET, if not more expensive. But here's a good tip: If you have ALM.NET, you are able to share your licenses from ALM.NET to Octane. You just have to define a dedicated number of licenses on ALM.NET and then you can share them with ALM Octane, with some configuration effort. This is something that you have to take into account, that there is a possibility of such license sharing that could decrease your costs. Compared to open-source tools, the price the ALM Octane is definitely higher, in terms of the licensing cost."

"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."

"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."

"The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."

"In terms of pricing, it's comparable to what we had previously. It's not priced at the higher end of the scale by any means. It's priced nicely, in the middle of the market. For what you're getting, it's a very good tool."

"There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."

"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."

"The solution has reduced our testing costs."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 33% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 28% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 19% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 10% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 47% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 8% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 3% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download GoCD product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

May 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Also Known As

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

Overview

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

Free Report: GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management

Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoCD vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.