We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • Gloat vs. SAP SuccessFactors

Gloat vs SAP SuccessFactors comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Gloat Logo
Gloat
261 views|177 comparisons
SAP SuccessFactors Logo
SAP SuccessFactors
Read 17 SAP SuccessFactors reviews.
12,620 views|9,662 comparisons
Featured Review
Use Gloat? Share your opinion.
ChristopherOrilogbon
Enabled us to efficiently manage our personnel and has the ability to set and review goals
It has improved my organization by enabling us to efficiently manage our personnel.
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Workday and others in Talent Management. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I don't want to comment on the license cost, to be honest. It could be about $1,000 approximately per customer. However, it's very flexible in terms of the licensing costs depending on the volume and depending on the deal of installation."
  • "If you go by best practices and do it right from the outset, the setup won't be a costly endeavor. In terms of setup, there is a lot of flexibility compared to three years ago."
  • "It could be cheaper."

    • More SAP SuccessFactors Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What PaaS can be used for Gloat?
    Top Answer: 
    Hi @HimanshuTejwani, @Venkateswarlu Paturu ​and @Abdulla Pathan. Can you assist @DIDIER GABIN ​with their question?  We appreciate your help.
    What is better, SAP HCM or SAP SuccessFactors?
    Top Answer: 
    When it comes to user experience, SuccessFactors is unquestionably superior, as it provides end users with a new experience and an advanced user interface. Additionally, the entire concept of SF is to… more »
    What do you like most about SAP SuccessFactors?
    Top Answer: 
    The self-service part is most valuable. Employees and managers can do a lot of things on their own, and they are not dependent on the HR organization.
    Read all 21 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP SuccessFactors?
    Top Answer: 
    It's my understanding that the licensing is paid on a yearly basis, however, I cannot speak to the cost. The project manager handles that aspect of the product. It's my understanding that SAP as a… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 53 in Talent Management
    Views
    261
    Comparisons
    177
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 53 in Talent Management
    Views
    12,620
    Comparisons
    9,662
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    602
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SuccessFactors
    Learn More
    Gloat
    SAP
    Overview

    Gloat is the first-ever Internal Talent Marketplace, used by the world’s leading enterprises. Our platform helps enterprises democratize career development, unlock skills, and future-proof their workforces, by utilizing a powerful AI engine and relying on years of experience and implementation.

    We enable enterprises to harness the hidden potential of talent throughout the organization by matching people to internal career opportunities that are right for them and provide mission-critical organizational agility, visibility, and insights.

    SuccessFactors helps organizations align strategy with objectives & manage people performance to ensure execution & results. Execution is the difference.
    Offer
    Learn more about Gloat
    Learn More
    Learn more about SAP SuccessFactors
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    City of Cape Town, ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd., TransAlta Corporation, Keolis, PT XL Axiata Tbk, National Football League (NFL), Plan International, Yoh, A Day & Zimmermann Company, China Talent Group (CTG TMO), Umicore S.A., Butterfield Bank, Skril
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Workday and others in Talent Management. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Gloat is ranked 21st in Talent Management while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 17 reviews. Gloat is rated 0.0, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Stable solution with automatic interlinking and reporting features". Gloat is most compared with eightfold.ai and Workday, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and PeopleFluent Talent Management.

    See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

    We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.