GitHub and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in code management and security solutions. GitHub has the upper hand in collaboration and community support, while Tenable.io is better for security and reporting.
Features: GitHub offers powerful collaboration tools, a robust branching and merging system, and integration capabilities with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Tenable.io provides detailed vulnerability analysis, comprehensive reporting features, and risk prioritization mechanisms.
Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve project management capabilities, simplify integrations, and enhance security scanning features. Tenable.io could refine its dashboards, make reporting more intuitive, and enhance integration options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is widely used across cloud environments with mixed reviews on support responsiveness, yet strong community support often fills the gaps. Tenable.io is deployed similarly and offers satisfactory technical support, despite some delays in response to specific inquiries.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers free and reasonable paid tiers with good ROI, especially for collaboration and time efficiency. Tenable.io has a higher entry cost, with pricing based on users or IPs, but provides cost-effective, comprehensive security features.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.