GitHub vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

GitHub and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. GitHub holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,996 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GitHub

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are both leaders in their respective fields; while GitHub focuses on source code management, Tenable.io emphasizes web application security. Users often highlight GitHub for its effective collaboration and integration features, whereas Tenable.io is often seen as the better choice for robust security scanning and vulnerability management.

Features: GitHub is praised for its Git Hooks, SSH keys, and efficient source code management. It excels in branch management and offers seamless integration with various DevOps tools. Tenable.io stands out with its vulnerability scanning and the ability to provide comprehensive reports, which are crucial for security purposes. It also integrates well with other products, effectively supporting various cloud platforms.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve its ticketing system and add integrations with more external tools like Slack. It also faces challenges with performance when handling large files and could benefit from making its platform more intuitive for newcomers. Tenable.io users note that the dashboard usability and the customization of reports need enhancement. They also express a desire for faster scanning options and more responsive technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both GitHub and Tenable.io offer deployment models that emphasize public cloud usage. GitHub benefits from substantial community support, providing users with a wealth of resources for troubleshooting. In contrast, Tenable.io offers structured technical assistance with regular interactions aimed at swift issue resolution, providing users with persistent support through experienced technical teams.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier with the option to upgrade, making it a budget-friendly choice for small teams while still providing enhanced features at reasonable prices. Tenable.io, regarded as costly for smaller businesses, justifies its price with extensive security features that contribute to long-term cost savings in security management. Both tools are considered valuable in their own right, with GitHub excelling in version control and collaboration, and Tenable.io focusing on providing effective security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.1%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
Other	97.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Jonathan-Pereira

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized license management transforms asset manipulation based on functions and improves security posture

Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions. It provides a centralized view from end-to-end to its assets' identities and vulnerabilities. One of the greatest features is Kubernetes. The automated scanning capability is pretty standard in the market, and Tenable's prioritization engine helps improve the security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very helpful, time saving, and user-friendly."

"The solution can scale."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

More GitHub pros

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It is fully automated."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"I am not so tied to Copilot, as I have been using Amp more in recent months."

More GitHub cons

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The pricing is okay."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.