GitGuardian Platform vs Harness comparison

GitGuardian and Harness are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitGuardian is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Harness is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.8. GitGuardian holds a 0.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to Harness’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Harness users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

4,023 Views
1,971 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Harness

Read 4 Harness reviews

2,431 Views
243 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Harness

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 28, 2025

Harness and GitGuardian Platform compete to enhance software development processes. GitGuardian Platform offers superior security features despite its higher cost, whereas Harness stands out primarily for its competitive pricing.

Features: Harness provides tools for CI/CD automation, aids in pipeline management, and ensures robust cloud cost management. GitGuardian Platform excels in detecting and managing sensitive data exposure, offers advanced security features, and provides real-time monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Harness could benefit from enhancing its security features, expanding its real-time monitoring capabilities, and simplifying its user interface. GitGuardian Platform might improve by offering streamlined deployment, reducing its false-positive rates, and enhancing onboarding documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harness features a streamlined deployment process, comprehensive documentation, and responsive customer support. GitGuardian Platform, though requiring initial fine-tuning, provides specialized support for its security features.

Pricing and ROI: Harness offers competitive pricing models with predictable costs and excellent ROI due to operational efficiency. GitGuardian Platform may entail higher setup costs but compensates with significant security benefits contributing to long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)

Harness

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (10th), Cloud Cost Management (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitGuardian has many features that fit our use cases. We have our internal policies on secret exposure, and our code is hosted on GitLab, so we need to prevent secrets from reaching GitLab because our customers worry that GitLab is exposed. One of the great features is the pre-receive hook. It prevents commits from being pushed to the repository by activating the hook on the remotes, which stops the developers from pushing to the remote. The secrets don't reach GitLab, and it isn't exposed."

"The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us."

"My impression of the GitGuardian Platform's capability to detect secrets in real time has been really amazing, because it lets us protect or block the pipelines in which we deploy new applications so we can acknowledge when a secret is hardcoded in a repository, or when we have already hardcoded secrets within templates in our repos."

"The stability of the GitGuardian Platform is excellent."

"The most valuable feature is the general incident reporting system."

"The newest addition that we appreciate about GitGuardian Platform is the ability to create a custom detector, which we built and worked with the team, and that works very effectively."

"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

"GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

Cons

"An area for improvement is the front end for incidents. The user experience in this area could be much better."

"There has been a little bit of downtime of late, and it has been reasonably impactful when it's not been scanning."

"GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from."

"We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times."

"The main disadvantage I feel they should improve upon is that apart from flagging credential issues or secrets, they could incorporate something else to make it more dynamic."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives."

"Right now, we are waiting for improvement in the RBAC support for GitGuardian."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

Our primary use case for Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) is as a deployment tool. Although I am not a DevOps engineer, my team uses Harness ( /products/harness-reviews ) for deployment purpos...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 14% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 12% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 18% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 11% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 8% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

August 2025

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

July 2025

Download Harness product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

Armory

Overview

GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.

GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.

What features define GitGuardian?

Internal Monitoring: Tracks confidential data like IDs and tokens.
Dev in the Loop: Rapid alerts for leaks.
Detection Capabilities: High accuracy with a low false-positive rate.
Integrations: Supports seamless integration with multiple platforms.
Customized Detectors: Offers tailored security solutions.
Multi-Vault Support: Facilitates efficient issue management.

What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?

Comprehensive Detection: Identifies AWS keys and other hardcoded secrets.
Efficient Remediation: Swiftly resolves issues.
Improved Security: Prevents accidental leaks of sensitive data.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps.

In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.

GitGuardian

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness

July 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Harness report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.