We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"It's very easy."
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Tungsten TotalAgility and Hubble, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. IBM Case Foundation report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
