Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe comparison

Microsoft and Pure Storage are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Read 35 Pure FlashArray X NVMe reviews
  • 920 Views
  • 432 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 27, 2025

Pure FlashArray X NVMe and Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] compete in the high-performance storage market. Pure FlashArray X NVMe stands out for its ease of deployment and customer satisfaction, while Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] is recognized for its high-end, feature-rich storage capabilities.

Features: Pure FlashArray X NVMe offers robust data reduction, consistent performance with low latency, and seamless scalability for demanding workloads. Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] provides unique resource disaggregation, high throughput, and strong data security and management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pure FlashArray X NVMe is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, enhancing user satisfaction. Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] may require more intricate setup but provides in-depth, tailored support.

Pricing and ROI: Pure FlashArray X NVMe is more budget-friendly initially, with faster ROI due to operational efficiency and lower total cost of ownership. Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL], though potentially more expensive upfront, is valued for its advanced features and long-term investment potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,451 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (15th), NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170159 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to implement and configure but the security and reporting could be improved
We are using the Fungible Storage Cluster as our on-premises NAS. It is primarily used for file storage The most valuable features are that it is easy to implement and configure, easy to use, and really reliable. The security and reporting could be improved. We have been using the Fungible…
Read full review
Eugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to save money and resources with the data compression feature
One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them. One way to improve the product is to add an operational assistant that doesn't depend on VMware. It could also establish more alliances with other operational systems.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are that it is easy to implement and configure, easy to use, and really reliable."
"It offers competitive performance, and the Evergreen storage model of Pure fits well with my organization."
"One of the best features is the support, which is excellent."
"It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is performing, the console gives you a lot of information. You can set thresholds as well as alerts based on the thresholds, which is a very powerful functionality. They are very proactive. They know how to monitor and manage the systems. They see a problem, and they are all over it before us. They see the problem before we see it, which is very good."
"I appreciate the performance."
"Everything, especially the VMs inside, is pretty fast."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its ease of use and performance."
"It has good, reliable, fast storage."
"The database workloads are pretty fast because I frequently move data from here to there."
More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros
 

Cons

"The security and reporting could be improved."
"The tool's pricing is higher than competitors."
"There are some challenges with data encryption and reduction."
"The software layer has to improve."
"Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial."
"Efficiency improvements would always be welcome, but I'm not sure if they could get more efficient."
"Maybe the price can be reduced since the solution is very expensive."
"Right now, the box itself is just strictly working as a backend storage system. It would be fantastic if we could access it directly like a NAS device through network access or SIS drives. I think they have an interface, but I am not sure how good it is. If we could address a box directly on the network without having to go through a server, it would be great. The replication schemas could be improved. We are not using replication on the storage level right now. We use a different type of replication. If their replication would be as good as the one that we have, I would probably run the replication schema because it might be faster, but I don't know that for a fact. So, I cannot say that they have good replication. All I can say is that they need to inform us better."
"I would like to see replication and DR features in the next release of this solution."
More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."
"Given its price, Pure is not the first option."
"The support cost per array is about $20,000 a year for 24/7 support."
"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."
"The tool's pricing is cheap; I rate it a six to seven out of ten. Most of our sales are not subscription-based. We sell the hardware, and customers keep using it. They only renew the service part annually. The support can be a bit pricey, but the solution is more cost-effective than anything else out there."
"The product is expensive."
"We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."
"Pure FlashArray X NVMe’s pricing is cheaper than other products."
More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
I am an engineer and am not aware of the setup cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?
Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial. Storage replication should be essential, and the analytics should not incur extra charges. This is one of the main things organizations need.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 31% of the time
TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 18% of the time
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 15% of the time
IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 11% of the time
HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo
HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Compared 8% of the time
More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
April 2025
Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] reportDownload Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
April 2025
Pure FlashArray X NVMe reportDownload Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X
 

Overview

Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] is an innovative storage solution designed to optimize data management and address performance bottlenecks, especially for enterprise-level businesses.

Designed to enhance storage efficiency, Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] utilizes advanced technology to streamline data processing, ensuring improved speed and reduced latency. Its modular architecture enables scalability, making it suitable for businesses looking to maximize their IT infrastructure. By focusing on efficient resource allocation, it provides a pathway for businesses to optimize operations while keeping costs under control.

What are the key features of Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL]?
  • High Performance: Delivers exceptional speed for data-intensive applications.
  • Scalability: Modular design allows seamless expansion of storage capacity.
  • Data Security: Implements robust measures to protect sensitive information.
  • Resource Efficiency: Optimizes the use of computing resources.
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational expenses through efficient resource use.
  • Simplified Management: Streamlines storage administration tasks.
  • Enhanced Performance: Increases application responsiveness.
  • Reduced Downtime: Improves system reliability and uptime.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Fungible Storage Cluster [EOL] is implemented to manage large-scale data sets efficiently. Its rapid data processing capabilities are essential for sectors that require high-performance analytics and secure data handling, supporting critical operations and decision-making processes.

Microsoft

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company
Buyer's Guide
NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nutanix and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors and best All-Flash Storage vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.