Fugue vs Prevasio comparison

Fugue
Read 2 Fugue reviews
  • 313 Views
  • 202 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Prevasio
Read 10 Prevasio reviews
  • 142 Views
  • 51 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Fugue and Prevasio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fugue vs. Prevasio Report (Updated: May 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Fugue vs. Prevasio
May 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,779 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Fugue
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
36th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (47th)
Prevasio
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

BV
Dec 16, 2021
Easy to set up with good flexibility in customization and good reporting
I can't comment if there are missing features at this time. For the last six to eight months I didn't work with Fugue. I don't have an up-to-date product roadmap to comment on what is or is not available, what they do or do not provide. I would need to review their current roadmap to be able to accurately comment on what is or is not available. Fugue capabilities are not well understood on the market. If there was one thing they could improve, it would be to basically explain in simple terms to market what it is they do. Right now, understanding what they do requires substantial experience and expertise. It wasn't a challenge for me to identify this area, however, I'm the exception. Generally speaking, there is not sufficient understanding in the broad market of what Fugue does. This is the area they need to focus on. The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively. What happens is they extend and augment capabilities that cloud suppliers offer. There is additional integrational and operational benefits that can be realized in how they extend and how they position themselves as compared to what cloud suppliers deliver.
Read full review
FS
Dec 4, 2022
Makes it very easy to maintain and manage our policies, the configuration, and various other maintenance of a particular firewall
The most unique feature is the ability to help fix any gaps or mismatches in the configuration of the firewall. The feature helps fill any configuration gaps that are present. There are various compliance regulations, such as GP or GDPR, HIPAA, PCI, and PCI DSS, that need to be followed. AlgoSec has pre-built templates for each of these regulations, which helps with reporting and compliance requirements specific to each industry. AlgoSec's built-in compliance feature is unique in that it provides company details related to compliance, which is needed for our industry. The integration of AlgoSec with various other security solutions is a plus. For example, we have integrated AlgoSec with Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto. This seamless integration allows for a more secure environment. The solution helps simplify the job of our security engineers. Managing a network with 50-100 firewalls typically requires 10 people. However, with the help of AlgoSec, two to three people can manage the same number of firewalls. We can manage our hybrid network infrastructure whether it is in the cloud or on-premises from a single pane of glass. This allows us to provide a cohesive and consistent experience across both environments.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The customization is excellent."
"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature is the automation that can be accomplished by using scripts. If we didn't have AlgoSec, I would have to do everything manually."
"AlgoBot is a Slack chatbot that they've designed to help people identify if the firewalls are going to allow or block specific network traffic. We leveraged this to allow our staff to check themselves if the firewalls are going to be blocking traffic or not. That saves us logging into the firewalls and running the query off the host. We give them the power to use it and it saves us time."
"We have Check Point, Palo Alto, and FortiGate firewalls, and it integrates pretty seamlessly with these firewalls. We have had no issues so far."
"We have used the solution to implement and manage microsegmentation initiatives. That is the whole point of modeling towards, "Hey, how will this work for a specific situation in the end?" I think it's a great solution because a lot of companies are not just going to the cloud, but microsegmentation and service-delivered products. So, I feel like it is very capable and comparatively better than its peers, if not equal."
"AlgoSec has good tools to manage policies and devices. Many administrators like how it helps you monitor and clean up the policy for the on-premise firewall."
"The firewall policy summarization is the most valuable feature. It helps us to cross-check the firewall ruleset. That's the main purpose of it. And of course, it monitors changes of the firewall policy. It provides full visibility into the risk involved in firewall change requests. It helps us to check for any integrity issues and conflicts with other rulesets, and of course the compliance."
"The workflow and the fact that I can follow up on a request that I've created and clearly see the status it is in are the most valuable features of this solution. When I need things to move on, for example, if the security guys didn't look at the request or the implementation is not going as it should, then I can contact people. There is a mechanism in there that clearly indicates the service level agreement we have for implementation. We can see if it is being attained."
"The optimizations are the most useful aspect because most customers have a very unmanaged network with a lot of rules. We use a lot of the optimizations in our reports for improving firewall rules."
More Prevasio pros
 

Cons

"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."
"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."
"We work with multiple security vendors. It's rather difficult to integrate the vendors. AlgoSec is a platform that hasn't really been developed as much as we would like to just because of its complexity to set up. If it was easy to set up and easy to get integrations with other companies, then we would be doing it. But the thought is that we are relatively stretched thin in our team as it is and the complexity of configuring AlgoSec doesn't make it any easier."
"There is a little bit of scope for improvement in the risk profiles that come with the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer module. Currently, AlgoSec provides only three standard zones within a risk profile. These standard zones are external, internal, and DMZ. Everybody's network is divided into different zones within a data center, but AlgoSec only provides three zones. This is a limitation that I see for the risk profile analysis. If there was an option to customize these zones, it would be great."
"AlgoSec cannot be integrated with solutions that require two-step or multi-factor authentication. Embedding multi-factor authentication capability into the solution would be a valuable feature."
"The analysis part can be improved when I make a flow request. There should be a clear analysis of which metric part needs to be opened and which firewalls will be opened. It should give you a bit more graphical visibility about these."
"In the new version H32, there are many, many bugs."
"Integration with Oracle on the cloud is not supported. I would also like to see integrations with network devices in Layer 2."
"Now that we've moved to the VM it is more stable and independent of hardware."
"When we send multiple requests across at once, sometimes it causes errors and FireFlow gets stuck. In cases like this, we have to go back in and fix it."
More Prevasio cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I heard that the licensing was around $100,000 a year."
"For the South American market, the prices are very high."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Educational Organization
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Prevasio?
The optimizations are the most useful aspect because most customers have a very unmanaged network with a lot of rules. We use a lot of the optimizations in our reports for improving firewall rules.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prevasio?
For the South American market, the prices are very high. We work with discounts, but it depends a lot on our commercial agent, and there is a lot of variance in pricing between different customers.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Prevasio?
Integration with Oracle on the cloud is not supported. I would also like to see integrations with network devices in Layer 2. While it's very focused on some goals that we must apply for security, ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Management
May 2024
Fugue reportDownload Fugue product report
Buyer's Guide
Prevasio
June 2024
Prevasio reportDownload Prevasio product report
 

Also Known As

Luminal
No data available
 

Learn More

Snyk
Video not available
AlgoSec
 

Overview

Fugue is an infrastructure-level cloud operating system. It builds, operates, and terminates cloud infrastructure and services and automates the continuous enforcement of declared infrastructure configurations. Fugue completes the DevOps workflow by automating cloud lifecycle management via enforced and versionable infrastructure as code. Fugue is a single source of truth and trust for the cloud.

Prevasio is an agentless cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) that provides increased visibility into security and compliance gaps, enabling cloud operations and security teams to prioritize risks and ensure compliance with internet security benchmarks.

Prevasio combines cloud-native security with SRI International's proprietary AI capabilities and AlgoSec’s expertise in securing 1,800 of the world’s most complex organizations.

 

Sample Customers

SAP, PBS, TrueCar, TravelBank
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Fugue vs. Prevasio
May 2024
Free Report: Fugue vs. Prevasio
Find out what your peers are saying about Fugue vs. Prevasio and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fugue vs. Prevasio report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.