Fugue vs IBM Spectrum Computing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Snyk Logo
209 views|134 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
4,076 views|3,768 comparisons
40% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fugue and IBM Spectrum Computing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
BorisVishnevsky
Mohamed Youssef
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The customization is excellent.""From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."

More Fugue Pros →

"We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues.""The most valuable aspect of the product is the policy driving resource management, to optimize the computing across data centers.""The most valuable feature is the backup capability.""Easy to operate and use.""Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis.""This solution is working for both VTL and tape."

More IBM Spectrum Computing Pros →

Cons
"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively.""It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."

More Fugue Cons →

"We'd like to see some AI model training for machine learning.""This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly.""We have not been able to use deduplication.""Lack of sufficient documentation, particularly in Spanish.""Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the cloud.""SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing."

More IBM Spectrum Computing Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This solution is expensive."
  • "Spectrum Computing is one of the most expensive products on the market."
  • More IBM Spectrum Computing Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:This solution is too expensive for a lot of our customers.
    Top Answer:The biggest problem is the lack of documentation in general, and documentation in Spanish, in particular.
    Ranking
    47th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    209
    Comparisons
    134
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    4,076
    Comparisons
    3,768
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    240
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Luminal
    IBM Platform Computing
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Fugue is an infrastructure-level cloud operating system. It builds, operates, and terminates cloud infrastructure and services and automates the continuous enforcement of declared infrastructure configurations. Fugue completes the DevOps workflow by automating cloud lifecycle management via enforced and versionable infrastructure as code. Fugue is a single source of truth and trust for the cloud.

    IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

    Sample Customers
    SAP, PBS, TrueCar, TravelBank
    London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, Genomic
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Educational Organization12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Media Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fugue is ranked 47th in Cloud Management while IBM Spectrum Computing is ranked 10th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. Fugue is rated 8.0, while IBM Spectrum Computing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fugue writes "Easy to set up with good flexibility in customization and good reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Computing writes "Provides stable backup for our databases and has good technical support ". Fugue is most compared with Wiz, whereas IBM Spectrum Computing is most compared with Apache Spark, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric and IBM Turbonomic.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.