We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Ranorex Studio vs froglogic Squish comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
froglogic Squish Logo
6,205 views|3,281 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
6,788 views|5,162 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: January 2022.
565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

More froglogic Squish Pros →

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.""The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance.""Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

More Ranorex Studio Pros →

Cons
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons →

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis.""The object detection functionality needs to be improved.""Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful.""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

More Ranorex Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing fees depend on the number of users."
  • "There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."
  • More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
    Top Answer: 
    I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I don't have those numbers, but it's under $10,000. I think it's around $6,000 or something like that. We have, I believe, four floating licenses and one console license, so it's a pretty small… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We don't use Ranorex very heavily, so I can't really say. As I said, I've got one legacy developer who uses it to create automation scripts, and they use Ranorex for some basic local hosting. We're… more »
    Ranking
    16th
    Views
    6,205
    Comparisons
    3,281
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    8.0
    12th
    Views
    6,788
    Comparisons
    5,162
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    716
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

    Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

    Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

    Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

    The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

    • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
    • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
    • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
    • Eclipse-based IDE
    • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
    • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
    • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
    • testing capabilities
    • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
    • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface

    Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/

    Start Your Free Trial Today!

    Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

    Offer
    Learn more about froglogic Squish
    Learn more about Ranorex Studio
    Sample Customers
    Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)
    Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Newspaper6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise42%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: January 2022.
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Ranorex Studio is ranked 12th in Test Automation Tools with 4 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "We can quickly add service agents wherever we need to so we can run multiple scripts in parallel". froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Tricentis Tosca and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ and Micro Focus UFT One.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.