Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Software Analyzer vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Ranking in Debugging
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Rational Software Analyzer
Ranking in Debugging
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Debugging category, the mindshare of froglogic Coco Code Coverage is 4.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Software Analyzer is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Debugging
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed
If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that. If somebody is already having some mechanism to write their unit test cases, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very good tool for giving the code coverage. The solution overall is still in development, they need to polish a few things moving forward. I rate froglogic Coco Code Coverage a seven out of ten.
Use IBM Rational Software Analyzer?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.
850,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Rational Software Analyzer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
SIBRA GmbH, IKB