We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWeb and Radware AppWall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most important feature of this solution is protection from attack."
"The solution has a good sandbox feature."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiWeb is the reports and the AI-based features."
"We find that it is quite stable and reliable."
"It helps us prevent attacks on servers."
"One of the big advantages of using Fortinet FortiWeb is all the Fortinet family solutions use the same user interface and logic. This makes it easy to use, configure, manage, and understand if you have used one of their solutions before or are wanting to implement other Fortinet solutions in the future. Additionally, all Fortinet solutions can be managed with one application called FortiManager."
"Fortinet is a great SD-WAN player when it comes to security capabilities."
"The support services, performance, and pricing are all valuable features. The performance is excellent."
"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"The product offers high availability."
"The documentation for the machine learning could be better."
"When we look at the incident reports in the dashboard, they are available for a maximum duration of 24 hours. They should provide more time for the analysis and increase the duration of the availability of these reports. Currently, it gives the options for 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours. It would be excellent if there are more options for a longer time period. It may be configurable, but I don't know how to do it."
"No solution is 100% secure and the security could always be worked on."
"Sometimes, even if you follow the documentation, it doesn't work as expected."
"The memory use in each of the appliances is problematic."
"In my experience, Fortinet FortiWeb could improve the intelligent features to acknowledge whether any threat or incident that's running happened. Then give us the ability to escalate it to layer 2 or layer 3 in the network operations."
"The solution could offer more integration opportunities."
"The automation piece can be improved. Although they say it can be automated very well, there is still manual work. Its usability should be improved in terms of automation because we want to build an infrastructure with code, but you can't do that easily with this solution. If they can give us APIs in the firewalls that we can tap into, it would be perfect."
"Scalability should be based on customer requirements."
"The user interface can be improved."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
Fortinet FortiWeb is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 29 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiWeb is rated 8.2, while Radware AppWall is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWeb writes "Good for compliance, load balancing, and high availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". Fortinet FortiWeb is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiADC, Fortinet FortiOS, AWS WAF and Azure Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Azure Web Application Firewall. See our Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Radware AppWall report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
