FortiMonitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor comparison

Fortinet and Power Admin are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Fortinet is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0, while Power Admin is ranked #74. Fortinet holds a 0.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Power Admin’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Power Admin users who would recommend it.

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

2,256 Views
1,151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 2 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

659 Views
521 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and FortiMonitor compete in the server monitoring category. Data comparisons indicate Power Admin PA Server Monitor has the upper hand due to pricing and customer support.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor provides server monitoring capabilities, alerting, and reporting tools. FortiMonitor offers performance monitoring, cloud integration features, and network visibility.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could improve its cloud integration, network visibility, and advanced analytics. FortiMonitor may enhance ease of use, initial deployment simplicity, and affordability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support. FortiMonitor, though complex to deploy, provides adequate support for large IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a cost-effective pricing model, enhancing ROI for budget-conscious businesses. FortiMonitor, despite a higher initial cost, delivers significant long-term value for organizations needing extensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (22nd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (13th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (8th)

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

74th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
FortiMonitor	0.7%
Power Admin PA Server Monitor	0.4%
Other	98.9%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

it_user225771

IT Network Engineer at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

The setup is straightforward, but the satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one.

* The status overview page provides a state of computers monitored and provides quickly what users need to focus on * The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure * The licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FortiMonitor is really easy to use for monitoring the logs on FortiGate...It is a stable product."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is user monitoring, as we are able to see if the user is following the policy or not from their system, and additionally the solution integrates well with Fortinet FortiGate and has centralized management."

"The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is user monitoring. We are able to see if the user is following the policy or not from their system. Additionally, the solution integrates well with Fortinet FortiGate and has centralized management."

"In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic, blocked sites, and the health of our hardware. That last part, about knowing if something's going to fail soon, is super important. It gives us time to sort things out before any big problems happen. As a system engineer, I need to keep tabs on everything – temperature, monitoring systems, and network operations. This data is really handy because it helps me ensure our site runs smoothly, whether it's turning systems on or off. Just last night, there was a system failure, but thanks to real-time monitoring, I quickly identified the problem and got the necessary replacement parts."

"With FortiMonitor, you can get all the logs of the traffic information of the destination or the source."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

More FortiMonitor pros

"The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure the licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost"

"The possibility to develop your own VB scripts."

Cons

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"We use FortiToken, and it's a pain to use because you have to send things through your phone and then confirm by email."

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

More FortiMonitor cons

"The satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one. It would reduce the size of the file, and reduce the time to deploy on weak connections."

"Basic monitoring on Unix was working really well but it didn't really help under machines in Windows Domain Controller."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiMonitor?

There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing. We have not yet upgraded to the latest software versions, being a full revision behind, but we plan to update soon since the current...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds ipMonitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

March 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Also Known As

Panopta

PA Server Monitor

Overview

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a comprehensive approach to server and network monitoring, aimed at enhancing IT efficiency. Its features provide robust monitoring capabilities tailored for system administrators seeking to maintain and optimize server performance.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is designed to streamline server management by providing detailed insights into system operations. It delivers functionalities that simplify the monitoring process, allowing IT professionals to identify and resolve issues efficiently. Its real-time alerting ensures timely reactions to potential issues, while reporting tools offer valuable data analysis, aiding in decision-making processes.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications help prevent potential downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed logs for performance monitoring and planning.
Remote Access: Manage servers from any location, increasing flexibility.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views to track critical metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing requirements.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations save time and reduce manual tasks.
Cost Savings: Early detection of issues minimizes repair costs.
Reliability: Enhanced system stability increases uptime and trust.
Flexibility: Adaptable features cater to specific monitoring needs.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is utilized across diverse industries, from healthcare to finance, where reliable server performance is crucial. Its customizable features support sector-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures and delivering consistent performance monitoring tailored to industry demands.

Power Admin

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

March 2026

Free Report: FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiMonitor vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.