FortiMonitor vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

Fortinet and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortinet is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.3, while PICO is ranked #74. Fortinet holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

1,625 Views
1,333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,134 Views
975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

```html

Pico Corvil Analytics and FortiMonitor compete in the network monitoring space. Pico Corvil Analytics holds an edge in data and speed analysis, while FortiMonitor stands out for its broad monitoring scope and flexibility, appealing to diverse infrastructure needs.

Features: Pico Corvil Analytics offers real-time data analysis, detailed visibility into network activity, and packet-level insights. FortiMonitor integrates multiple network elements into a unified dashboard, provides comprehensive monitoring, and a wide surveillance capacity.

Room for Improvement: Pico Corvil Analytics could enhance its deployment options, expand its monitoring scope, and improve cost efficiency. FortiMonitor may refine its data precision, offer more detailed analytics, and enhance real-time monitoring capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiMonitor provides flexible deployment with on-premises and cloud options, seamlessly integrating into systems, supported by accessible customer service. Pico Corvil Analytics offers a sophisticated setup, tailored to specific environments with specialized support.

Pricing and ROI: Pico Corvil Analytics incurs a higher initial cost due to advanced technology, delivering substantial ROI through network insights. FortiMonitor offers an affordable setup and justifies cost impact with its adaptability and operational efficiency, maintaining significant ROI.

```

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,452 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

JaimeVasquez

Commercial Manager at IT-Experience

Monitoring capabilities keep operations running smoothly and alerts enhance proactive system management

We use FortiMonitor to monitor the infrastructure of our customers. We check on what is happening with their operations, monitor bandwidth, ensure configurations are appropriate for the customer, and identify if anything is going wrong The most valuable features of FortiMonitor are its redundancy…

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FortiMonitor is 100% stable."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"FortiMonitor's dashboard is very informative and user-friendly."

More FortiMonitor pros

"As part of my role in monitoring multiple client connections, I would use Pico Corvil Analytics to set up alerts for performance issues, such as TCP resends and dropped packets. These alerts would trigger when the volume was low and performance was poor, allowing me to work with our trading partners to find a resolution. I would present them with the statistics I had and together, we would identify the source of the issue. This collaboration resulted in the client often reconfiguring their systems. For example, we may find that a network connection needed to be made. Overall, this proactive approach helped to maintain strong connections with our clients and minimize disruptions to trading revenue."

"We're able to quickly drill down and find answers to events that are happening in real-time, using Corvil's analytics tools. That's the feature which is most in the spotlight..."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"The tool's price in Vietnam is high, making it an area of concern where improvements can be made."

More FortiMonitor cons

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 27% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 13% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 11% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

July 2025

Download FortiMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

June 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

Panopta

Corvil

Overview

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Free Report: FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiMonitor vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.