"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."
"The accuracy of its scans is great."
"The solution is easy to use."
"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."
"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."
"Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."
"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."
"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."
"This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers."
"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."
"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."
"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."
"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us."
"It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application."
"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."
"The scanner could be better."
"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."
"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."
"The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches."
"The price of GitLab could improve, it is high."
"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem."
"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."
"It can be free for commercial use."
Fortify WebInspect is ranked unranked in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 5 reviews while GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 23 reviews. Fortify WebInspect is rated 6.8, while GitLab is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortify WebInspect writes "Good reporting and vulnerability management, but needs better performance and resource utilization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "A double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management". Fortify WebInspect is most compared with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, OWASP Zap, Veracode and Rapid7 AppSpider, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TeamCity, Tekton, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and AWS CodePipeline. See our Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab report.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
