IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Fortify WebInspect vs GitLab comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
15,293 views|13,557 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
608,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features.""The accuracy of its scans is great.""The solution is easy to use.""When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC.""The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

More Fortify WebInspect Pros →

"Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security.""I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand.""GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable.""This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers.""The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints.""It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us.""We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

More GitLab Pros →

Cons
"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us.""It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application.""Lately, we've seen more false negatives.""The scanner could be better."

More Fortify WebInspect Cons →

"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating.""Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes.""We would like to generate document pages from the sources.""The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches.""The price of GitLab could improve, it is high.""We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem.""I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira.""It can be free for commercial use."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
  • "Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
  • "The price is okay."
  • More Fortify WebInspect Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    608,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC.
    Top Answer:It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application. Its installation… more »
    Top Answer:Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install.
    Top Answer:When I was hired (in 2020) they told me that they were using an open-source version. I'm not sure if that's still the case as it's a quite big company. Nowadays they should be using some kind of paid… more »
    Top Answer:The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features. It should be more GitOps-ready.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    1st
    out of 34 in Build Automation
    Views
    15,293
    Comparisons
    13,557
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fortify WebInspect is an automated DAST solution that helps security professionals and QA testers uncover security vulnerabilities and configuration concerns by providing complete vulnerability detection. This is accomplished by mimicking real-world external security attacks on a live application in order to discover and prioritize concerns for root-cause study. Fortify WebInspect provides a number of REST APIs for easier integration, as well as the ability to be maintained via an intuitive UI or totally automated.

    Fortify WebInspect may be used as a completely automated solution to suit DevOps and scaling requirements, and it integrates seamlessly with the SDLC. REST APIs aid in closer integration by automating scans and ensuring that compliance standards are satisfied. Users can make use of pre-built integrations for Micro Focus Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Quality Center, as well as other security testing and management platforms.

    Teams may reuse current scripts and tools thanks to powerful connectors. Any Selenium script can be simply integrated with Fortify WebInspect. Fortify WebInspect supports Swagger and OData formats via the WISwag command line tool, allowing it to work with any DevOps workflow. A scan template can be pre-configured by ScanCentral Admin and sent to users to scan their apps, with zero security knowledge required.

    Fortify WebInspect Features

    Fortify WebInspect has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Security testing of functional applications (FAST): FAST can use all of the functional tests in the same way as IAST does, but it will continue crawling. FAST will not miss anything that a functional test misses.
    • Insights from a hacker's perspective: View discoveries such as client-side frameworks and version number. These are findings that, if not addressed, could lead to vulnerabilities.
    • Workflow macros HAR files: Fortify WebInspect can scan workflows with HAR files, ensuring that crucial content is not missed.
    • Management of compliance: Preconfigured policies and reports for all key online application security compliance regulations, such as PCI DSS, DISA STIG, NIST 800-53, ISO 27K, OWASP, and HIPAA.
    • Horizontal scaling can help you speed up your work: Using Kubernetes, horizontal scaling creates little versions of WebInspect that only process JavaScript. This allows the scans to run in parallel, resulting in significantly faster scans.
    • Scan any API for better accuracy: Get the complete picture on APIs, including SOAP, Rest, Swagger, OpenAPI, and Postman.
    • Managing the security of enterprise applications: To meet DevOps requirements, monitor trends within an application and take action on the most critical issues first.
    • Deployment options: With the flexibility of on-premise, SaaS, or AppSec-as-a-service, you can get started immediately and scale as needed.

    Fortify WebInspect Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Fortify WebInspect. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Vulnerabilities are discovered faster and earlier.
    • Automation and agent technology can help you save time.
    • Users can utilize crawl web technologies and modern frameworks.
    • ScanCentral DAST helps you manage enterprise app security risk.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Fortify WebInspect stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. One major one is its robust centralized dashboard, which gives insight into all vulnerabilities.

    Milin S., an Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm, writes of the product, “Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features. The vulnerability management part of it is very easy. We can suppress or comment on each vulnerability and assign a vulnerability to an individual risk owner, which makes the work easy.”

    GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

    Offer
    Learn more about Fortify WebInspect
    Learn more about GitLab
    Sample Customers
    Aaron's
    Siemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, Vaadin
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Mining And Metals Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    608,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify WebInspect is ranked unranked in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 5 reviews while GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 23 reviews. Fortify WebInspect is rated 6.8, while GitLab is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortify WebInspect writes "Good reporting and vulnerability management, but needs better performance and resource utilization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "A double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management". Fortify WebInspect is most compared with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, OWASP Zap, Veracode and Rapid7 AppSpider, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TeamCity, Tekton, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and AWS CodePipeline. See our Fortify WebInspect vs. GitLab report.

    We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.