GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. GitLab is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 11.4% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

20,902 Views
627 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 21 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

3,718 Views
706 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and GitLab serve different needs in application security testing and DevOps pipelines. GitLab generally has an advantage due to its extensive features and support, while OpenText offers competitive pricing and strong customer service.

Features: OpenText focuses on automated vulnerability detection, secure code quality, and security enhancements. GitLab integrates CI/CD tools, collaboration capabilities, and extensive repository management, offering a holistic development environment.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance integration features and streamline reporting processes. GitLab might improve on reducing complexity in its feature set and providing more targeted support for smaller teams. Both products can focus on simplifying user interfaces to facilitate ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers robust support with thorough documentation and direct service channels, ensuring smooth deployment. GitLab relies on community support and online resources, which are helpful but may extend deployment times for users unfamiliar with its systems.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has competitive pricing with lower initial costs, appealing to security-focused organizations. GitLab’s higher cost reflects its comprehensive DevOps features, providing significant ROI for those needing an all-in-one development tool.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,170 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in DevSecOps

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (10th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of GitLab is 11.4%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 6.7%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

"The solution is stable."

"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

"It is scalable."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are ease of use and highly intuitive UI and performance."

More GitLab pros

"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."

"The solution is easy to use."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."

"It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple."

"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."

"The self-hosted version of GitLab is not very stable when under load. It slows down and requires restarts every few days."

"We'd always like to see better pricing on the product."

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

"The pricing has been substantially increased, which is a major concern."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"The initial setup was quite challenging because it takes some time to understand how to pull out or push the code."

"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents."

More GitLab cons

"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"We have often encountered scanning errors."

"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."

"I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities."

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."

"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."

"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"We are using the open-source version."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"This solution is very expensive."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"The price is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortify WebInspect?

The solution's technical support was very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

The price of Fortify WebInspect is high, with the cost depending on the number of virtual users. It is approximately 25% higher than other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate. The cost of the license depends on the number of virtual users and, in comparison to...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 25% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 19% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Contrast Security Assess vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.