Fortify Software Security Center vs GitGuardian Public Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and GitGuardian Public Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have.""This is a stable solution at the end of the day.""You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

More Fortify Software Security Center Pros →

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots.""The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pros →

Cons
"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved.""This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users.""Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

More Fortify Software Security Center Cons →

"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers.""I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
  • More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
    Top Answer:It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
    Top Answer:I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    376
    Comparisons
    300
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    73
    Comparisons
    29
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,292
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
    Learn More
    GitGuardian
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)

    The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.

    With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.

    With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.

    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
    Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortify Software Security Center vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 3 reviews while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 19th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 2 reviews. Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4, while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Fortify on Demand, Tricentis Tosca, Checkmarx One and Fortify WebInspect, whereas GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk. See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring report.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.