Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

Forcepoint and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Forcepoint holds a 0.3% mindshare in DLP, compared to Broadcom’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Read 3 Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews

120 Views
51 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Read 59 Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews

3,623 Views
2,270 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP are competing products in the data security category. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP has a slight edge due to its advanced features catering to dynamic environments.

Features: Symantec Data Loss Prevention offers extensive data protection across various platforms, focusing on in-depth data monitoring and analysis. It provides comprehensive coverage and solid integration capabilities. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP features real-time risk assessment with automated response, adaptable data protection tailored to varying threat levels, and an adaptive protection strategy suitable for dynamic environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Data Loss Prevention is known for its straightforward deployment and robust support resources, facilitating seamless integration. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP features a more complex deployment model, requiring a detailed setup due to its advanced capabilities but provides a robust security structure. Both offer commendable customer support, with Symantec preferred for its ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Data Loss Prevention is cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations while ensuring solid ROI with comprehensive features. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP, though having a higher setup cost, offers robust adaptive security features, potentially leading to a significantly higher ROI through enhanced data protection and threat response capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Pr...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is 6.3%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Nataraj KS

CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd

Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work

The onboarding process wasn't inherently complex, but it did take some time to open ports and configure the server. We're using three components of DLP: Endpoint DLP, email DLP, and web DLP. Web DLP isn't fully configured yet because we don't have a proxy. Email DLP took some additional coordination with a third party, and our Office 365 API, but those challenges were resolved. We have it installed and deployed on-premises. We have a partner who maintains it. It covers around 3,000 endpoints. It's deployed across our branches, factories, warehouses, and head office. It covers all endpoints in those locations. The deployment took some time due to our different locations.

Read full review

ARAVINDAN K

Information Security Engineer 4 at Amadeus

Strengthened security operations with endpoint-level protection but database flexibility could improve

Symantec Data Loss Prevention has proprietary metadata and is well-suited for endpoint-level security. It stands out for supporting multiple protocols like email and SMTP without needing user profile login for endpoint agents. Once policies are downloaded to the local system, they function independently of a user's login. The solution helps enhance security operations when integrated with ServiceNow and offers robust incident response capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."

"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."

"Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is purely a DLP-based solution, which makes it the best option available."

"For detection, it has a great algorithm. It can recognize ID numbers and everything that you put in a policy for the end-users. That is really great for us as an institution where we have sensitive data. It recognizes all the sensitive data when someone tries to transfer it or put in other data."

"The tool's really working well, and the agents are good."

"DLP's most valuable feature is compliance."

"One of the most valuable aspects of this solution is its integration capabilities with Office 365."

"The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its broad coverage. Symantec DLP covers USB, Outlook email clients, and web traffic. If we install the endpoint DLP, we can cover multiple channels, including the clipboard and printer."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention has proprietary metadata and is well-suited for endpoint-level security."

"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."

"The synchronize application detection policies have been very good."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."

"The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved."

"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."

"I would like for the administrator management interface to improve. It's kind of old and slow. Updating it would make this solution better."

"There should be more documentation with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. We had trouble with the first few deployments."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved."

"I would like to see changes to the analytics."

"Symantec could be better with infrastructure."

"Sometimes setting up the solution can get a little tricky because it would depend on your internal infrastructure. For example, you have to connect the Symantec Data Loss Prevention platform and you need to integrate it, so that could make the process somewhat difficult."

"Different departments should manage administration, reporting, normalization and incident management."

"There should be more information about the features of the solution and what they do. This way we would be able to use all the features that are available."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."

"DLP could be a bit cheaper."

"The solution should be less expensive to allow more people the opportunity to use it. Some of their competitors are less expensive. There is a license required to use the solution and we purchased an annual license."

"The solution's pricing is based on a license model."

"The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."

"If you are a small firm with less than 150 users, Symantec can be too pricey."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"We are happy with the pricing and licencing."

"The price is competitive."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is very costly, especially in Sri Lanka, but the compliance ROI justifies the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB ( /products/casb-reviews ) is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

I do not have an idea about pricing, as it is handled by another team responsible for procurements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle, especially compared to other products like Forcepoint, which offer MSSQL database options that are more convenient.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 37% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 19% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 9% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP report

Download Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

May 2025

Download Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec DLP

Overview

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic security measures tailored to data protection needs, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded efficiently.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is designed to provide a balanced approach to data loss prevention by adapting security measures based on real-time risk assessment. This innovative system prioritizes protecting sensitive information while allowing for seamless workflow integration, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking to enhance their data protection strategies.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Dynamic Policy Enforcement: Automatically adjusts security policies in real-time based on risk analysis.
User Behavior Analysis: Monitors and analyzes user actions to identify potential threats.
Comprehensive Data Coverage: Offers protection for data across various environments and platforms.
Risk-Adaptive Responses: Provides threat mitigation options based on the assessed level of risk.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Reduced Data Breach Risks: By dynamically adjusting security measures, threats are mitigated proactively.
Operational Efficiency: Allows seamless integration of security with daily operations, minimizing disruptions.
Scalable Protection: Easily adapts to organizational growth and evolving security needs.
Cost-Effective Security: Optimizes resource allocation by focusing on high-risk areas.

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is particularly effective in industries with stringent data protection requirements such as healthcare, finance, and government. It adapts its security posture to the specific risks faced in these sectors, addressing compliance mandates and safeguarding sensitive information efficiently.

Forcepoint

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Free Report: Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.