Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs GitGuardian Public Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP and GitGuardian Public Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.""We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."

More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pros →

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots.""The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pros →

Cons
"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis.""The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."

More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Cons →

"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers.""I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."
  • More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
  • More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
    Top Answer:The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license.
    Top Answer:Ideally, it should have some native analytical tools with good graphical options, but the current options lack customization. Improved analytical tools would provide a more granular technical view and… more »
    Top Answer:The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
    Top Answer:It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
    Top Answer:I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    29
    Comparisons
    18
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    682
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    77
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,292
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    GitGuardian
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Simplifying data security through personalized automation

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)

    The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.

    With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.

    With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
    Buyer's Guide
    Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is ranked 26th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is rated 7.0, while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP writes "Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is most compared with , whereas GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk. See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.