We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP and GitGuardian Public Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."
"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."
"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."
"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."
"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."
"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."
"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."
More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pricing and Cost Advice →
More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is ranked 26th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is rated 7.0, while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP writes "Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is most compared with , whereas GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk. See our Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.