Flowmon vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Progress Software Logo
527 views|423 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Logo
263 views|194 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Flowmon and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Detection and Response (NDR) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce.""It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution.""The solution is stable."

More Flowmon Pros →

"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats.""If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.""Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser.""Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams.""The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.""The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.""It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.""I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

Cons
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good.""The licensing price could be better.""It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

More Flowmon Cons →

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right.""Technical packaging could be improved.""Technical support could be improved.""The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required.""Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.""A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see.""I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet.""It is very expensive, the price could be better."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."
  • "The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."
  • "The price of the solution could be better."
  • More Flowmon Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce.
    Top Answer:If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good.
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    527
    Comparisons
    423
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    263
    Comparisons
    194
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Flowmon Anomaly Detection System
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Sample Customers
    SEGA
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government10%
    Educational Organization8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Detection and Response (NDR)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR). Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Flowmon is ranked 14th in Network Detection and Response (NDR) while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 7th in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 36 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and Plixer Scrutinizer, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI.

    See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.