Fivetran vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced comparison

Fivetran and Hitachi Vantara are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Hitachi Vantara is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Fivetran holds a 3.9% mindshare in DR, compared to Hitachi Vantara’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hitachi Vantara users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

208 Views
143 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Read 2 Hitachi Thin Image Advanced reviews

663 Views
354 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced and Fivetran compete in data management. Fivetran holds the upper hand due to its strong data integration capabilities.

Features: Hitachi Thin Image Advanced provides efficient storage virtualization, cost-effective storage management, and optimized resource use. Fivetran offers seamless data integration, automation, and support for diverse data sources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi Thin Image Advanced features straightforward implementation with strong support. Fivetran ensures rapid deployment, ease of use, and proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi Thin Image Advanced offers competitive upfront costs and significant ROI from cost savings. Fivetran's higher initial investment is justified by the ROI from enhanced data connectivity and automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Ranking in Data Replication

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 3.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is 8.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

Bratislav Petkovic

System Engineer for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia

Fast data transfer and quick setup for new servers

We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers Hitachi Thin Image allows us to quickly create new data snapshots. It speeds up synchronization and setup tasks significantly, which is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

More Fivetran pros

"The most beneficial feature is its fast data transfer capabilities."

"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."

Cons

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool."

"In our case, we ultimately did not end up using Fivetran because we were able to do custom connects at a lower cost compared to Fivetran. From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

More Fivetran cons

"Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center."

"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

34%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Import And Exporter

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hitachi Thin Image?

Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center. Better management could enhance the overall experience.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hitachi Thin Image?

We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hitachi Thin Image?

Thin Image is suitable for both small and big companies. It is highly recommended for its fast performance. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

NetApp Snapshot vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Compared 63% of the time

Hitachi ShadowImage vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Compared 37% of the time

More Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

April 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

March 2025

Download Hitachi Thin Image Advanced product report

Also Known As

No data available

Hitachi Thin Image

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Nondisruptively copy data within any Hitachi storage system or virtualized storage pool. Hitachi Thin Image snapshot software quickly creates copies for immediate use in decision support, software development and modern data protection operations.

Hitachi Vantara

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Net Credit Financial Group

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

April 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.