We performed a comparison between Evanios and OpenText Operations Bridge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring."Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."
"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."
"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."
"From our monitoring perspective or from a visibility perspective, HPE UCMDB is a must have. It's an amazing piece of software."
"It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's."
"We use the on-premises version to monitor our systems and manage emails. All our systems use Operations Bridge, especially the critical systems."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"It has greatly reduced the number and duration of outages as support teams are notified immediately when something goes wrong or even before something breaks."
"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."
"The price could be cheaper."
"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources."
"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
Evanios is ranked 13th in Event Monitoring with 6 reviews while OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews. Evanios is rated 9.6, while OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Evanios writes "The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". Evanios is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.