ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR comparison

ESET and Stellar Cyber are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. ESET is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.4, while Stellar Cyber is ranked #35. ESET holds a 1.3% mindshare in XDR, compared to Stellar Cyber’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ESET PROTECT Enterprise and Stellar Cyber Open XDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.9%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET PROTECT Enterprise is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stellar Cyber Open XDR is 2.0%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	4.9%
ESET PROTECT Enterprise	1.3%
Stellar Cyber Open XDR	2.0%
Other	91.8%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Manikumar David

IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates

Provides comprehensive monitoring and policy implementation with room for memory optimization

ESET PROTECT Enterprise makes the system a little slow sometimes and updates occur at startup. Sometimes unwanted pop-ups appear to users, and they are unable to disable them. The user-friendliness is lacking in some areas. When users are using any computer, ESET PROTECT Enterprise should work in the background without consuming much memory, and any updates should proceed in the background without disturbing the user.

Read full review

Hrishiraj Bhattacharjee

Founder & CEO at Team Karimganj

Correlates incidents, allows for quicker identification and helps prioritize investigations

The only challenge is, and that’s where we come into play, it’s a pretty high-tech platform. So, it’s difficult for small and medium-sized organizations to manage it on their own. It’s a very complex system. It requires a lot of expertise. All my guys who work on it have gone through certification from Stellar itself. There are three different certifications that you need to complete. Only then are you certified by Stellar to work on it. It’s a very complex platform. Not everyone can use it. A simple IT engineer or system admin won’t be able to handle it because it’s quite complex. You need to have an understanding of the industry, the subject, and the tool. So, just purchasing this tool or license and then using it on your own would be very difficult to configure and manage on a day-to-day basis. The pricing model is not suitable for small and medium companies, particularly small companies. The minimum pricing model they have is suitable for companies with more than one thousand users. So, if someone has 50 to 100 users, like typical small companies, it’s difficult for them because the cost involved is high. Stellar would charge you for those thousand users, but you do not need all those users. So what are they going to do? I guess Stellar does not want to target small companies directly and maybe relies on resellers and MSPs like us to sell it. So, that is something I would recommend changing. Otherwise, it’s a great tool, but because of the pricing model, small companies are unable to leverage the advantage of this beautiful tool. So, the pricing model should be suitable for small and medium businesses. The product currently has vulnerability monitoring and everything. But if they could also do something about vulnerability management and maybe patch management, that would be nice.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is easy to use and does not consume a lot of hardware resources."

"The normal protection was really effective, and we detected situations that if we didn't have Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it's highly likely that we would have been affected, but it protected the infrastructure."

"If the user leaves our premises or network, Palo Alto Traps will still be on that endpoint and will still apply our policies."

"There are a lot of lead solutions in this space, however, Palo Alto is number one."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface."

"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management; Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them."

"Cortex Xnor's playbooks predefine the workflow of the automation, such as response processes, alert triggering, and enriching the context, collecting relevant indicators such as hashes, IP addresses, or domains efficiently and can detect and block malicious attacks with firewalls."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable. We chose Traps because it is the only product that we were not able to get anything past."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It does everything we need it to do and it's easy to use."

"ESET's strong points are that it is an unintrusive, easy-to-maintain, and deploy antivirus solution."

"The solution provides EDR. You can customize how you prepare the endpoint for clients and the dashboard alerts."

"The solution is easy to use and install, with good pricing."

"I like the dynamic groups feature. They give the ability to filter endpoint machines by any parameter, software, or hardware inventory, and that's a significant advantage when you need to, for example, automate a secondary firewall profile for endpoints outside your network. Or if you want to automatically isolate the computer from the rest of the network if the ransomware is found."

"We can easily manage resources, disable or enable clients and update them."

"Regarding real-time analytics and threat detection capabilities in ESET PROTECT Enterprise, I find them excellent."

"From my personal perspective, it is easy to see on the console what's happening with each system."

More ESET PROTECT Enterprise pros

"Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers these functionalities at a more affordable price, making it easier for me to position it with price-sensitive customers."

"It can integrate with almost any cybersecurity tool available in the market."

Cons

"There's room for improvement with Mac device installations, which can be challenging."

"Cortex does not offer an on-premises solution. However, some customers would prefer not to be on the cloud. It would be ideal if it could offer something on-prem as well."

"The solution eats memory of the computer, unlike anything I've ever seen."

"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."

"It is a complex solution to implement."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can improve mobile integration to allow access to the console."

"The solution can never really be an on-premises solution based simply on the way it is set up. It needs metadata to run and improve. Having an on-premises solution would cut it off from making improvements."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The management console could be improved. Sometimes, agents lose connection with the management console, and the administration team needs to reinstall the agents on the computers."

"The availability and sustainability could also be improved."

"They need to reduce the number of notifications on the endpoints."

"ESET Protect could improve the performance. The performance of the home computers and laptops becomes slow due to their heavy software load. It would be a benefit to make a lighter version of the software which does not have any impact on the performance of the computer's hardware."

"In terms of management accounts, there's a lot of manuals that seem to be mixed up. Sometimes, it's a little bit confusing."

"Certain updates prompt the computer to restart automatically. Users have complained that it initiates computer restarts during their work without intervention."

"In terms of management accounts, there's a lot of manuals that seem to be mixed up. Sometimes, it's a little bit confusing."

"Sometimes, the connection to the machine requires troubleshooting."

More ESET PROTECT Enterprise cons

"I would rate the stability at about five to six. The platform requires some fine-tuning, especially when integrating data sources and creating connectors."

"Support is an issue because they have a limited number of resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The product is cost-effective compared to one of its competitors."

"ESET PROTECT Enterprise is affordable."

"There is a license needed to use ESET Protect. The licensing cost is very low, it is approximately $10 per license."

"It’s a single license platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET Protect?

One area for improvement in ESET PROTECT Enterprise is its capabilities on Mac devices, which are less functional com...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Protect?

My customers use ESET PROTECT Enterprise to secure all their operating systems; we have a lot of customers who rely o...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ESET Protect?

I suggest that other users considering ESET PROTECT Enterprise utilize this platform to manage all their laptops and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Stellar Cyber Open XDR?

Pricing is a major benefit of Stellar Cyber Open XDR. I rate it between three and four on the cost scale. It offers f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stellar Cyber Open XDR?

I am currently evaluating Stellar Cyber Open XDR in terms of their support. I do not see any major areas for improvem...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Stellar Cyber Open XDR?

I use Stellar Cyber Open XDR ( /products/stellar-cyber-open-xdr-reviews ) as a 24/7 security monitoring tool, especia...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

360 Safeguard vs ESET PROTECT Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

F-Secure Total vs ESET PROTECT Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET PROTECT Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Advanced SystemCare Ultimate vs ESET PROTECT Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More ESET PROTECT Enterprise Competitors

Wazuh vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Compared 8% of the time

Sentinel vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Compared 3% of the time

More Stellar Cyber Open XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET PROTECT Enterprise

March 2026

Download ESET PROTECT Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

February 2026

Download Stellar Cyber Open XDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ESET Protect, ESET File Security

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ESET PROTECT Enterprise ensures real-time visibility for all endpoints as well as full reporting and security management for all OSes

Cloud-based console with the possibility of an on-premises deployment
Provides real-time visibility of all endpoints: desktops, servers, virtual machines and even managed mobile devices
Enables full reporting for ESET security solutions
Controls endpoint prevention, detection & response layers across all platforms
Connect anytime, anywhere from your favorite web browser

ESET

Stellar Cyber Open XDR delivers an advanced, unified security solution designed for real-time threat detection and intelligent response, reducing complexity by integrating multiple tools into a single interface.

Stellar Cyber Open XDR aggregates security data from many sources to provide comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. It offers a streamlined, user-friendly experience, allowing teams to efficiently manage incidents. By automating routine security tasks, it enhances operational efficiency and increases visibility across the entire network infrastructure.

What are the key features of Stellar Cyber Open XDR?

Open Integration: Connects with existing security tools for seamless data aggregation and correlation.
AI-Powered Analytics: Uses artificial intelligence to predict, detect, and respond to threats with high accuracy.
Automated Incident Response: Accelerates the fighting-back process through intelligent automation.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Offers clear visibility into security metrics through customizable dashboards.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved Threat Detection: Recognizes threats faster, allowing quick response to reduce potential damage.
Increased Efficiency: Reduces manual work by automating repetitive tasks, saving time for IT teams.
Cost Reduction: Consolidates security tools, decreasing overall expenditure on multiple solutions.
Enhanced Collaboration: Allows diverse security teams to work together more effectively with shared insights.

Stellar Cyber Open XDR is implemented across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, offering tailored security strategies suited to industry-specific challenges. Organizations can take advantage of this integrated approach to align security operations with industry regulations efficiently.

Stellar Cyber

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Sumitomo Chemical USA, PlastiPak Packaging, University of Denver, Large California State Agency, Large Midwestern American City

Buyer's Guide

ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR

February 2026

Free Report: ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR

Find out what your peers are saying about ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ESET PROTECT Enterprise vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.