Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eptica WCS Suite vs HubSpot CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Eptica WCS Suite
Ranking in CRM
51st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HubSpot CRM
Ranking in CRM
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Eptica WCS Suite is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HubSpot CRM is 1.2%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HubSpot CRM1.2%
Eptica WCS Suite0.7%
Other98.1%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Use Eptica WCS Suite?
Leave a review
reviewer2396643 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
Has streamlined customer interaction tracking but the pricing structure needs more flexibility
The biggest constraint with HubSpot CRM is their pricing. Their per-user pricing is on the higher side, and most of their enterprise contracts require a minimum one-year guarantee for any enterprise agreement. Because we are using a free module of HubSpot CRM, we certainly see some value in it. We have been willing to pay HubSpot CRM money in the past. We certainly see an ROI out of that. The constraint is that they require a year-long commitment of minimum number of users. Our number of users is lesser than the commitment that they require. They require minimum five users to be signed into HubSpot CRM. Normally within the organization, there are only two or three people who use it. From that point of view, the seat cost and annual commitment are some of the things where we currently don't see a lot of value in using it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user9726 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 5, 2013
WCS vs Hybris vs ATG - Feature Smackdown
They say "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder", so if you are a purist in one of these technologies you would probably never agree to my comparison matrix, However these are my personal opinion, From my experience standpoint I have longest exposure to WCS Commerce Suite and the least with ATG…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Performing Arts
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about HubSpot CRM?
The best thing about HubSpot is its clear workflow. Anyone can understand the flows of your contacts, your emails, their delivery dates, and the reasons behind their movements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HubSpot CRM?
The cost is about the same price, currently charged monthly.
What is your primary use case for HubSpot CRM?
We are a user of HubSpot CRM. We are not a customer because we use all the free modules of HubSpot CRM over the last years that we have used it. Because the CRM is free, we use the CRM. HubSpot CRM...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

WCS Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Easyroommate, L'Occitane en Provence, Vivastreet, Ageas Insurance Solutions, Britannia Hotels Group
digimind, easyrecrue, software2, subaru, suzuki
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Zoho and others in CRM. Updated: March 2026.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.