Entuity vs Infraon IMS comparison

Park Place Technologies and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #67, while EverestIMS is ranked #88. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,747 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

1,379 Views
786 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entuity

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Infraon IMS are competitive network management solutions. Entuity seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Infraon IMS offers more comprehensive functionality, suggesting an advantage in features.

Features: Entuity offers robust network management capabilities with efficient fault, performance, and inventory management focused on real-time monitoring and alerting. It also provides scalable solutions suitable for small to medium-sized enterprises. Infraon IMS delivers a wide array of features, including seamless integration with various IT systems, extensive automation support, and a holistic management approach, which can benefit larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could improve its integration capabilities with diverse IT systems and further enhance automation support. It may also benefit from a more comprehensive feature set to appeal to larger enterprises. Infraon IMS might consider offering a lower setup cost or flexible pricing models to attract smaller businesses, streamlining its deployment process, and enhancing its real-time monitoring to match market leaders.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity presents a straightforward deployment model with various support options facilitating fast setup and efficient problem resolution. Infraon IMS offers a flexible deployment environment with advanced customer service options, which can be particularly beneficial for managing complex IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity generally presents a lower setup cost delivering good ROI for small to medium-sized enterprises. Infraon IMS, while potentially having a higher upfront cost, demonstrates significant ROI through its extensive feature set, making it attractive for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive network management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Infraon IMS

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (33rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (51st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Entuity	0.7%
Infraon IMS	0.4%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, simplicity of the end user's experience (the forms and the sheets that you use, the screens you can use to see what's going on, and overall capability), as well as the ease of integration into other solutions."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

"I would recommend Entuity to other users as it's user-friendly and easier to manage than other solutions."

"The best thing about Entuity is that it's easy to use. It's user-friendly. It's intuitive and easy to customize as per your needs."

"My clients have received a good return on investment."

"I would encourage others to use Entuity, as it's powerful and user-friendly."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

More Entuity pros

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

More Entuity cons

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"In terms of improvements, I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

23%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 5% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 6% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 6% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

March 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

March 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Infraon IMS

March 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.