EmpowerID vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

EmpowerID and IBM are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. EmpowerID is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. EmpowerID holds a 0.7% mindshare in IAM, compared to IBM’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EmpowerID users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

EmpowerID

Read 2 EmpowerID reviews

459 Views
335 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

1,924 Views
558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

EmpowerID

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

EmpowerID and IBM Security Verify Access compete in identity and access management. EmpowerID leads in user satisfaction due to pricing and support, whereas IBM Security Verify Access is preferred for its comprehensive functionality.

Features: EmpowerID offers workflow automation, role-based access control, and robust task management. IBM Security Verify Access provides advanced authentication methods, flexible policy management, and broader security protocols.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: EmpowerID's modular architecture allows quicker, simplified deployment with efficient customer service. IBM Security Verify Access requires detailed integration efforts but benefits from enterprise-grade support and exhaustive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: EmpowerID is known for competitive setup costs and rapid ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations. IBM Security Verify Access may have higher initial expenses but offers enriched capabilities for long-term strategic value.

To learn more, read our detailed EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EmpowerID

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (10th)

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (15th), Access Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of EmpowerID is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Security Verify Access	1.3%
EmpowerID	0.7%
Other	98.0%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Varun Khandavalli

Senior Specialist Engineering Dev. & Integration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

An excellent application with a strong use case

It is very intuitive and has improved significantly over the last seven years. Its deployment is very enterprise-focused, and I hope it will eventually become cloud-based for easier connection through AWS or similar services. Currently, it's an It is very intuitive and has improved significantly over the last seven years. Its deployment is very enterprise-focused, and I hope it will eventually become cloud-based for easier connection through AWS or similar services. Currently, it's an excellent application with a strong use case.

Read full review

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very intuitive and has improved significantly over the last seven years. Its deployment is very enterprise-focused, and I hope it will eventually become cloud-based for easier connection through AWS or similar services. Currently, it's an excellent application with a strong use case."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

Cons

"I would like to see EmpowerID move to the cloud to facilitate easier deployment and connectivity through AWS or similar services."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EmpowerID?

The cost is fairly moderate, although I can't recall the exact amount, it's around twenty five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with EmpowerID?

I would like to see EmpowerID move to the cloud to facilitate easier deployment and connectivity through AWS or similar services.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EmpowerID?

EmpowerID is an application that helps move LC-MS and HPLC data from instruments to systems of record to be able to get that data and manage it. It is used for a lot of small molecule research and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

See all answers

Comparisons

One Identity Active Roles vs EmpowerID

Compared 29% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs EmpowerID

Compared 22% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs EmpowerID

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs EmpowerID

Compared 12% of the time

One Identity Manager vs EmpowerID

Compared 10% of the time

More EmpowerID Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

December 2025

Download EmpowerID product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access

January 2026

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

The Dot Net Factory EmpowerID

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

All-in-one Identity Management & Cloud Security platform designed for comprehensive provisioning, SSO, and access governance.

EmpowerID

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Sample Customers

Glencoe Specialty Services, GoDaddy, GTSI Corp., Alere Inc., Anadarko Petroleum, Bank of America, Bank of New York, Caterpillar, Coldwell Banker

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access

December 2025

Free Report: EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our EmpowerID vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.