Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eggplant Test vs ZAPTEST comparison

Keysight Technologies and ZAPTEST are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while ZAPTEST is ranked #30. Keysight Technologies holds a 4.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to ZAPTEST’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of ZAPTEST users who would recommend it.
Eggplant Test
Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews
  • 3,466 Views
  • 2,253 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST
Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
  • 507 Views
  • 274 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

ZAPTEST and Eggplant Test are competing products in the software testing automation field. Eggplant Test has an advantage in features, while ZAPTEST excels in pricing and customer support.

Features: ZAPTEST provides broad application testing capabilities, seamless tool integration, and the ability to test across multiple environments. Eggplant Test offers intelligent testing with AI-driven analytics, multi-platform support, and advanced adaptability, making it superior in analytics.

Room for Improvement: ZAPTEST could enhance its AI-driven analytics, expand platform support, and improve automation capabilities. Eggplant Test might benefit from simplifying its deployment model, lowering setup costs, and enhancing customer support for quicker resolutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZAPTEST simplifies deployment with strong customer support, facilitating effective integration. Eggplant Test offers a complex deployment model but compensates with extensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: ZAPTEST offers competitive pricing and minimal setup costs, leading to enhanced ROI and appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Eggplant Test has higher setup costs but potentially better long-term ROI due to advanced features, requiring a more substantial initial investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.7
ZAPTEST boosts ROI by enabling automation, eliminating manual testing phases and multiple tester hires, achieving 100% user-reported ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.
Sentiment score
9.1
ZAPTEST excels in responsive customer service and support, with flexible pricing and effective issue resolution praised by users.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.
Sentiment score
8.9
Organizations experience seamless scalability with ZAPTEST, reporting smooth operations even under high demands due to effective license integration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.
Sentiment score
7.0
ZAPTEST's version 15.0.75 resolves previous stability issues, though minor crashes affect 2% of users occasionally.
 

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.
Users find ZAPTEST documentation outdated, desire better support, improved features, and enhanced test result and save functions.
For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.
ZAPTEST provides cost-effective enterprise solutions with flexible licensing, low fees, and a free evaluation, making it a budget-friendly choice.
 

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.
ZAPTEST offers advanced testing automation with cross-platform compatibility, multi-device support, and integrations, reducing effort and costs efficiently.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ZAPTEST report
 

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)
ZAPTEST
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
30th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.0%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Eggplant Test4.0%
ZAPTEST0.4%
Other95.6%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort
I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.
Read full review
it_user362916 - PeerSpot reviewer
We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.
* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?
The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?
The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test
Compared 18% of the time
Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test Logo
Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test
Compared 13% of the time
Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test Logo
Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test
Compared 12% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test
Compared 11% of the time
Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test
Compared 8% of the time
More Eggplant Test Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST
Compared 58% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST
Compared 42% of the time
More ZAPTEST Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test
October 2025
Eggplant Test reportDownload Eggplant Test product report
Buyer's Guide
ZAPTEST
September 2025
ZAPTEST reportDownload ZAPTEST product report
 

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights
No data available
 

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies
ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
ZAPTEST
 

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST
September 2025
Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Eggplant Test vs. ZAPTEST report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.